Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI
Ramniwas S/o Durga Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 CrPC at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein-below:
| S.No. | Particulars of the Case | |
| 1. | FIR Number | 233/2023 |
| 2. | Concerned Police Station | Rohat |
| 3. | District | Pali |
| 4. | Offences alleged in the FIR | Sections 8/20 & 29 of the NDPS Act |
| 5. | Offences added, if any | Section 8/25 of the NDPS Act. |
| 6. | Date of passing of impugned order | 22.10.2024 |
2. The concise facts of the case as alleged in the FIR are that on 31.08.2024, at about 1:30 PM, near Jalore Crossing, Sri Lakshman Singh, SHO, Police Station Rohat and his team intercepted a truck bearing registration number RJ-19-GJ-0227 which wasbeing driven by the petitioner. It is alleged that upon search of the vehicle, recovered 63 packets of Ganja (One quintal 650 grams in weight) came to be recovered. The petitioner was arrested and since then he is behind the bars. Now, more than one and half years have lapsed but the trial is not going to be culminated and still it seems that a further long time shall be taken in conclusion of the same.
3. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the
Improper sample collection in drug cases violates mandatory guidelines, impacting the prosecution's case and justifying bail despite Section 37 restrictions.
Improper evidence collection under NDPS Act can lead to bail eligibility despite serious charges, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures and the right to personal liberty.
The court emphasized that proper sampling procedures must be followed in drug cases, and long incarceration can justify bail despite stringent conditions under the NDPS Act.
The court established that non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act can render evidence inadmissible, and that prolonged detention without trial can justify the grant of bail despite ....
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural safeguards in drug-related cases, ruling that non-compliance can render evidence inadmissible and affect bail decisions.
The court established that procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence, impacting the decision to grant bail.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial; failure to adhere to Section 52A can lead to the inadmissibility of evidence and impact bail decisions.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence, and failure to adhere to these provisions can lead to the grant of bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
