Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
MANOJ KUMAR GARG, RAVI CHIRANIA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Balel Singh S/o Jella Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
1. Instant criminal appeal has been filed by the State against the judgment dated 21.11.2001, passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) (Sessions Judge), Hanumangarh, in Cr. Case No.01/1997, whereby the learned trial court acquitted the accused-respondent from the offences punishable under Sections 459, 302 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2. Brief facts necessary to be noted for deciding the controversy are that on 02.10.1996, a parcha bayan was given by the complainant Kaur Singh (PW-12) to Shri Tara Chand, SHO PS Goluwala at Government Hospital, Pillibanga to the effect that when complainant was working at a flour mill near his home with Sawan Singh (PW-2) and Prakash (PW-3) and his wife, Angrej Kaur, was cooking inside the house, the complainant saw Balel Singh entering his home with a wooden stick and being suspicious of his intentions due to an old animosity between their families, he immediately ran towards the house. He found that Balel Singh had already struck his wife with the stick. Hearing the commotion, others gathered, and Balel Singh fled the scene with the weapon. The complainan
In criminal appeals, courts uphold acquittals unless there is clear evidence of error in the trial court's reasoning or a definitive finding of guilt based on the evidence presented.
An acquittal under the SC/ST Act can only be overturned if the appellate court finds compelling reasons, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity of substantial evidence.
The judgment reinforces that in criminal cases, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and acquittal should be upheld unless clear evidence of guilt is established.
An acquittal can only be overturned if the trial court's decision is unreasonable or contrary to the evidence presented.
The court upheld the acquittal due to insufficient evidence, emphasizing the need for compelling reasons to overturn such judgments.
The presumption of innocence in favor of the accused and the need for compelling circumstances to interfere with an order of acquittal.
The presumption of innocence and the burden of proof require that the prosecution must establish intent and sufficient evidence for a murder conviction.
The principle that an acquittal should not be disturbed unless there are compelling reasons, and the presumption of innocence is reinforced by such acquittal.
The presumption of innocence in favor of the accused is reinforced by the trial court's acquittal, and appellate courts should only interfere with an order of acquittal in exceptional cases with comp....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
