IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
ANAND SHARMA
Ankit Bansal S/o Shri Shriniwas – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through Directorate Of GST Intelligence, Jaipur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of gst evasion (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defense arguments against arrest (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. prosecution's stance on bail (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. judicial rationale for denying bail (Para 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 47) |
| 5. decision on bail application (Para 48 , 49 , 50) |
ORDER :
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under section 483 of BNSS for seeking regular bail in respect of FIR number DGGI/INT/ARM/5/2024–0/OADG/DGGI/JZU–JAIPUR dated 03.06.2024, registered at office of DGGI, JZU, Jaipur for offences punishable under section 132 (10)(b)(c)(j) and (l) of Central goods and services tax act 2017.
2. Brief facts which are relevant for the purpose of adjudication of the instant bail application are that officers of the Directorate General of GST intelligence (hereinafter shall be referred as ‘DGGI’), while conducting investigation in relation to a firm, namely M/S Om Sai Traders and Suppliers, it was indicated that the Firm was engaged in trading of grains by showing exempted supply in monthly GST returns (GSTR–3B) as we
Vineet Jain vs. Union of India
Ashutosh Garg vs Union of India
Ratnambar Kaushik vs. Union of India
Shekhar Prasad Mahto vs. Registrar General
A. Tajudeen Vs. Union of India
Ayub Khan vs. State of Rajasthan
State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal
Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Nittin Johari
State of Maharashtra v. Sitaram Popat Vetal
Ash Mohammad v. Shiv Raj Singh & Anr.
Economic offences, especially involving large sums and serious allegations, require stringent scrutiny of the accused's conduct, including attempts to abscond and prior criminal history, to deny bail....
Any offence under this Act may, either before or after institution of prosecution, be compounded by Commissioner on payment, by person accused of the offence, to Central Government or State Governmen....
The court established that in cases of economic offences, while the gravity of the allegations is significant, the presumption of innocence and the nature of evidence must also be considered when dec....
In economic offences, anticipatory bail must be granted sparingly, considering serious allegations and the need for effective investigation.
The severity of economic offences, the need for a different approach in bail matters, and the larger interest of the public and State in such cases influenced the court's decision.
The court established that personal liberty must be protected and that the gravity of the offence alone cannot justify denial of bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.