Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MANOJ KUMAR GARG, RAVI CHIRANIA
Devi Singh, S/o Khim Singh Rawat – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Judgment :
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.)
Instant criminal appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against judgment dated 20.01.1997 passed by learned District & Sessions Judge, Rajsamand, in Sessions Case No.101/1994 by which the learned Trial Court acquitted the accused Devi Singh from offence under Sections 109 & 120-B of IPC and convicted him for offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo six months’ SI.
2. Vide order dated 01.05.2023 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the appeal in respect of appellant No.2- Maan Singh has been dismissed as abated.
3. Brief facts necessary to be noted for deciding the controversy are that on 21.04.1994 at about 01:15 AM, complainant- Smt. Radha (PW/6), orally informed the police at Police Station Bhim that on the same day at around 8:00 PM, her husband- Babu Singh, and his nephew- Narayan Singh, were consuming liquor at their residence. During this time, Punam Singh, son of the deceased, was dancing to music. An altercation ensued between Babu Singh and the accused persons. As a result of this altercation, both accused indivi
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide depends on the presence of intent; absence of premeditation warrants a lesser charge under Section 304 Part II IPC.
Absence of premeditation and intent to kill during an altercation qualifies the act as culpable homicide not amounting to murder under IPC Section 304 Part II.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide is fundamentally based on the presence or absence of intent, with actions classified under Section 304 Part II when committed without intention to....
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder depends on the presence of intent and premeditation, especially in cases of sudden provocation.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide lies in the presence of intent and premeditation, with spontaneous acts being treated as culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on the accused's intent; insufficient evidence of intent led to reclassification from murder to culpable homicide.
The court established that absence of intention to kill, even in a fatal altercation, can lead to a conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of intention and premeditation in categorizing the offence under the Indian Penal Code.
Culpable homicide is not murder if committed in a fit of passion during a sudden quarrel, as determined by Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
