Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
DINESH MEHTA
Rohit Aggarwal S/o Nandkishore Akwam Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Lalit Kumar Sidana S/o Kaluram Sidana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The writ petition in hands lays challenge to the order dated 11.03.2025 passed by the Appellate Rent Tribunal, Sri Ganganagar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellate Tribunal’), whereby the tenant – petitioners’ application dated 05.02.2025 filed under section 21(3) of the RAJASTHAN RENT CONTROL ACT , 2001 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 2001’) has been dismissed.
2. The facts germane are, that the rent petition filed by the respondent – landlord was allowed by the Rent Tribunal vide order dated 09.02.2023, whereagainst the petitioners had preferred an appeal (Rent Appeal No.03/2023), which is pending consideration before the Appellate Tribunal.
3. During the pendency of the aforesaid appeal, the petitioners moved the subject application under section 21(3) of the Act of 2001 and prayed that the respondent – landlord be directed to produce bank statement and Income Tax return while also praying that son of the respondent – landlord be recalled in the witness box, which application has been dismissed by the order impugned.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the rent petition was filed by the respondent – landlord for bona-fide need and necessity
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
