Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI
Jai Singh S/o Pitram Jat – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and details of the case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail application (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis of facts and legal provisions (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. conclusion and granting of bail (Para 12) |
ORDER :
1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing the instant bail application under Section 439 CrPC at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
| S. No. | Particulars of the Case | |
| 1. | FIR Number | 77/2023 |
| 2. | Concerned Police Station | Sadar |
| 3. | District | Chittorgarh |
| 4. | Offences alleged in the FIR | Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act |
| 5. | Offences added, if any | Section 8/25 & 29 of the NDPS Act |
| 6. | Date of passing of impugned order | 05.02.2025 |
2. The concise facts of the case as alleged in the FIR are that the petitioner came to be arrested in this case on 27.02.2023 in connection with recovery of 355 Kg poppy husk (in 18 bags) from the Truck Container bearing registration No.RJ41-GA4969 which was being driven by petitioner. His first, second and third bail applications being SBCRLMB No.10065/2023, & 12529/2024 were dismissed by this Court vide orders dated 03.10.2023 & 22.10.2024. Whi
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
