Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Banshi Yadav S/o Shri Jagannath Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Sohan Singh Naruka S/o Shri Kan Singh Naruka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. By way of filing of this petition, the petitioner is seeking directions to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sawai Madhopur to decide the criminal complaint expeditiously within a period of two months.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a complaint filed by the petitioner is pending before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, wherein the evidence of the complainant was completed on 03.05.2024 and thereafter, the case was ordered to be listed for leading defence evidence by the accused-respondent. Counsel submits that thereafter several dates have been taken by the accused for producing the defence evidence, but till date, no evidence has been produced. Counsel submits that the accused wants to the delay the disposal of the complaint submitted by the petitioner, hence, appropriate directions be issued.
3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record.
4. It is true that after completion of evidence of the complainant, the case is posted for recording the defence evidence of the accused, but the question remains for consideration of this Court is that whether any time bound schedule can be fixed by this Court in exerc
Constitutional courts generally refrain from imposing time-bound schedules for lower court proceedings unless exceptional circumstances are present.
Constitutional courts should refrain from imposing time-bound schedules on trial courts for case disposal, except in exceptional circumstances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
