Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
NUPUR BHATI
Kishore Singh S/o Late Shri Loon Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chhanwar Lal Kachhwah S/o Jagdish – Respondent
यह मामला राजस्थान के भूमि और पट्टे कानून से संबंधित है जिसमें एक विवादित जमीन पर निर्माण और हस्तांतरण को लेकर जारी अस्थायी आदेश को चुनौती दी गई है। अदालत ने स्पष्ट किया है कि जब तक कोई अंतिम निर्णय नहीं हो जाता, तब तक अस्थायी आदेशों के खिलाफ पुनर्विचार याचिका दायर करना संभव नहीं है। विशेष रूप से, अस्थायी आदेशों को अंतिम निर्णय नहीं माना जाता, इसलिए उन्हें आधार बनाकर पुनर्विचार याचिका का दर्जा नहीं दिया जा सकता।
अदालत ने यह भी कहा है कि पुनर्विचार की सीमा बहुत ही सीमित है और केवल उन मामलों में ही यह माना जा सकता है जब न्यायालय ने अपने अधिकार का उल्लंघन किया हो या अवैध तरीके से कार्य किया हो। अस्थायी आदेशों के खिलाफ पुनर्विचार की अनुमति नहीं है, क्योंकि वे स्थायी निर्णय नहीं होते।
अंत में, अदालत ने यह निर्देश दिया है कि संबंधित प्राधिकारी अपने लंबित मामले को जल्दी से जल्दी निपटाएं। साथ ही, यह भी सुनिश्चित किया गया है कि जब तक निर्णय नहीं आ जाता, तब तक कोई नई निर्माण कार्यवाही नहीं की जाएगी।
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Briefly noted facts of the present writ petition are that the petitioners have filed a suit for partition and injunction under Section 53, 181 of Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 along with an application under Section 212 Rajasthan Tenancy Act against the respondents with respect to agricultural land is situated at village Baga, Tehsil Jodhpur measuring 76 bigha 8 biswa.
Learned trial Court has passed an interim order dated 21.12.2022 on the application to the effect that neither construction should be done on land in question nor it should be transferred.
Aggrieved by the order dated 21.12.2022, respondent No.1 - Chhanwarlal Kacchawa filed an appeal along with stay application before the Revenue Appellate Authority. The Revenue Appellate Authority vide order dated 17.10.2025 decided the interim application finally and granted permission to respondent No.1 for raising the construction.
Being aggrieved by the order dated 17.10.2025 passed by Revenue Appellate Authority, the petitioners filed a revision petition under Section 230 read with Section 221 of the Act of 1955 before Board of Revenue.
The revision petition was dismissed by the
Revisions under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act are maintainable only against final decisions; interim orders do not constitute 'decided cases'.
Revision petitions under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act are not maintainable against interim orders, which are not final adjudications, reinforcing the distinction between revisional and ap....
Revision – Law mandates maintainability of revision petition only in a “decided” case by subordinate revenue court where no appeal lies and secondly, on the ground of jurisdictional error committed b....
Revision petitions against ad-interim orders are not maintainable under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, as such orders are not 'decided cases'.
Revision under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 applies only to final orders, not interim orders.
The Board of Revenue cannot exercise revision powers against interim orders when an appeal is available under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act.
A revision petition before the Board of Revenue is not maintainable when an appeal provision is available. An aggrieved party can either move the appellate court or approach the same court which pass....
A revision petition against an ex-parte ad-interim stay order is not maintainable if an appeal is available under the relevant legal provisions.
The court affirmed that revisions against interlocutory orders can be maintainable under certain circumstances, and emphasized the importance of timely adjudication in tenancy disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
