SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2117

DINESH MEHTA
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Indri Devi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Amit Mehta, for the Appellant;Mr. R.J. Punia, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Instant writ petition is directed against the order dated 23.09.2021, passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer, whereby the learned Board of Revenue had dismissed petitioners' revision petition that was filed under Section 230 read with Section 221 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 against the order dated 09.03.2021, passed by the learned Revenue Appellate Authority.

2. Petitioners' revision petition was dismissed by the Board as according to the Board revision was not maintainable against an interlocutory order passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority.

3. Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioners invited Court's attention towards the order dated 17.08.2021, passed by the Board of Revenue in another Revision (T.A No.3424/2021) and submitted that in identical circumstances, the Board of Revenue has not only entertained the revision petition but has granted interim relief in said matter and, therefore, learned member of the Board of Revenue was not legally justified in holding petitioners' revision petition to be not maintainable.

4. Mr. RJ. Punia, learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, without prejudice to his contention that revision petition is not mainta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top