SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2117

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Dinesh Mehta, J.
Shanti Devi & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Indri Devi & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13886/2021
Decided On : 08-11-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Amit Mehta, for the Appellant;Mr. R.J. Punia, for the Respondent.

The court affirmed that revisions against interlocutory orders can be maintainable under certain circumstances, and emphasized the importance of timely adjudication in tenancy disputes.

Headnote:

REVISION - TENANCY ACT - The court addressed the maintainability of a revision petition under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, specifically regarding interlocutory orders. The court highlighted that the Board of Revenue's dismissal of the petitioners' revision was not justified, given a precedent where similar revisions were entertained. The court directed the Revenue Appellate Authority to expedite the pending appeal, emphasizing the need for timely resolution while maintaining the status quo on the disputed land.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petition was filed against the Board of Revenue's order dismissing the petitioners' revision petition under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, which challenged an interlocutory order from the Revenue Appellate Authority.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Board of Revenue's dismissal of the revision petition was not legally justified, as it had previously entertained similar petitions under identical circumstances.

Issues: Whether the revision petition against an interlocutory order is maintainable under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, and the appropriate course of action regarding the pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that the maintainability of a revision petition should be considered in light of previous decisions by the Board of Revenue, and directed the Revenue Appellate Authority to resolve the pending appeal expeditiously.

Result: The writ petition was disposed of with directions for the Revenue Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal by 31.12.2021, while maintaining the status quo on the disputed land.

ORDER

1. Instant writ petition is directed against the order dated 23.09.2021, passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer, whereby the learned Board of Revenue had dismissed petitioners' revision petition that was filed under Section 230 read with Section 221 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 against the order dated 09.03.2021, passed by the learned Revenue Appellate Authority.

2. Petitioners' revision petition was dismissed by the Board as according to the Board revision was not maintainable against an interlocutory order passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority.

3. Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioners invited Court's attention towards the order dated 17.08.2021, passed by the Board of Revenue in another Revision (T.A No.3424/2021) and submitted that in identical circumstances, the Board of Revenue has not only entertained the revision petition but has granted interim relief in said matter and, therefore, learned member of the Board of Revenue was not legally justified in holding petitioners' revision petition to be not maintainable.

4. Mr. RJ. Punia, learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, without prejudice to his contention that revision petition is not maintainable, submitted that since appeal filed by the respondents (his clients) is pending consideration before the Revenue Appellate Authority, instead of deciding the issue as to whether revision filed by the petitioners against an interlocutory order is maintainable or not, the Revenue Appellate Authority itself be directed to dispose of the pending appeal expeditiously.

5. In view of the submissions made and considering that the appeal filed by the respondents No.l to 4 against the interlocutory order dated 25.01.2021, granted by the Assistant Collector is still pending before the Revenue Appellate Authority, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the Revenue Appellate Authority to decide the said appeal (No.14/2021) expeditiously, preferably before 31.12.2021.

6. Both the parties are directed to appear before the Revenue Appellate Authority on 22.11.2021.

7. The date given by the Revenue Appellate Authority shall stand modified accordingly.

8. On the next date i.e. 22.11.2021 or any other convenient date to be fixed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, the appeal will be heard and decided in accordance with law.

9. Till the appeal is decided, the parties shall maintain status-quo in relation to title and record of the disputed land.

10. Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top