HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nazma Bano Widow Of Nanne Khan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing appeals against tribunal awards. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding insurance liability and permit violations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. distinction between permit violation and insurance policy breach. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. validity of driver's license under motor vehicle laws. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. determining future prospects in compensation. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. calculating compensation based on age and income. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. principles regarding consortium and funeral expenses. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. consistency in applying compensation standards. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. determining liability based on vehicle capacity. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 10. final judgment and appeal dispositions. (Para 38 , 39 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
JUDGMENT :
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.
1. As the present miscellaneous appeals have been filed against the common judgment and award dated 24.06.2017 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Bundi (hereinafter referred to as learned 'Tribunal’), the same are being heard and decided by the instant common judgment.
2. The instant appeals have been preferred by the appellants under Section 173 of the Mot
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Anjana Shyam
Mukund Dewangan Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
M/s Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Rambha Devi & Ors.
National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi & Others
Sarla Verma and others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and others
United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur & Ors.
Magma General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors.
Insurance companies cannot evade liability solely based on permit violations; they must demonstrate specific breaches of policy conditions according to the Motor Vehicles Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of legal provisions under the Motor Vehicles Act, particularly Sections 165, 166, 149, 2(21), and 2(47), in determining the compens....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the insurer to establish a fundamental breach of the policy to avoid liability and the determination of notional income in the ....
Insurance company is not liable for compensation when driver lacks valid endorsement for hazardous goods transport, reversing Claims Tribunal's decision.
The court upheld that failure to prove the invalidity of a driver's license imposes compensation liability on the insurer, reiterating principles for calculating dependency and future prospects in wr....
The insurer can be held liable for compensation despite policy breaches if negligence by the driver caused the accident, and overloading alone does not exempt liability unless it contributed to the i....
Insurer liable for compensation despite fake driving licence unless it proves owner was aware of fakeness and still permitted driver to drive; owner need not verify licence authenticity from issuing ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.