Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI
Pappulal S/o Bardichand Alias Bardu Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding bail application. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. evaluation of evidence and judicial custody. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. importance of adherence to ndps procedural rules. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. procedural sanctity and evidentiary quality for severe charges. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. identified lapses in procedural compliance. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. consequences of non-compliance with ndps procedures. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. assessment of grounds for bail. (Para 20) |
| 9. interpretation of bail conditions under ndps. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 10. prosecution's burden in securing continued detention. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 11. presumption of innocence at pre-conviction stage. (Para 27) |
| 12. order granting bail. (Para 28) |
ORDER :
FARJAND ALI, J.
1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 483 BNSS at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
| S.No. | Particulars of the Case | |
| 1. | FIR Number | 16/2023 |
| 2. | Concerned Police Station | Rashmi |
| 3. | District | Chittorgarh |
| 4. | Offences alleged in the FIR | Section 8/15, 29 NDPS Act and Section 134/187 M.V. Act |
| 5. | Offen | |
Strict adherence to statutory procedures is essential in drug-related offenses, and the failure thereof can undermine prosecution's case and infringe upon personal liberty.
Non-compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act can undermine the prosecution's case and justify the grant of bail.
Procedural compliance in the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence, impacting the court's discretion in granting bail.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial; failure to adhere to sampling and inventory requirements can undermine the prosecution's case and justify bail.
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural safeguards in drug-related cases, ruling that non-compliance can render evidence inadmissible and affect bail decisions.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in drug seizure cases, ruling that non-compliance can render evidence inadmissible and affect bail decisions.
The court emphasized the necessity of compliance with NDPS Act provisions for admissibility of evidence, granting bail due to procedural lapses and prolonged incarceration.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial; failure to adhere to Section 52A can lead to the inadmissibility of evidence and impact bail decisions.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence, and failure to adhere to these provisions can lead to the grant of bail.
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural safeguards in drug-related cases, granting bail due to significant delays and procedural lapses.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
