Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI
Pappulal S/o Bardichand Alias Bardu Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp – Respondent
ORDER :
FARJAND ALI, J.
1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 483 BNSS at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
| S.No. | Particulars of the Case | |
| 1. | FIR Number | 16/2023 |
| 2. | Concerned Police Station | Rashmi |
| 3. | District | Chittorgarh |
| 4. | Offences alleged in the FIR | Section 8/15, 29 NDPS Act and Section 134/187 M.V. Act |
| 5. | Offences added, if any | - |
| 6. | Date of passing of impugned order | 20.08.2024 |
Facts of the Case
2. The present petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in FIR No. 16/2023 registered at Police Station Rashmi, District Chittorgarh, for the alleged offences under Sections 8/15 and 8/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. As per the prosecution case, on 17.01.2023, while on routine patrol, the police officials of P.S. Rashmi intercepted a Scorpio vehicle bearing No. RJ 09 UB 0633 and a pickup vehicle. On noticing the police party, the occupants of both vehicles allegedly fled from the spot. The driver of the Scorpio was identified as Ratanlal Jat, while the driver of the pickup vehicle was identified as Pappu. Upon conducting a search of the pickup vehicle, the po
Strict adherence to statutory procedures is essential in drug-related offenses, and the failure thereof can undermine prosecution's case and infringe upon personal liberty.
Non-compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act can undermine the prosecution's case and justify the grant of bail.
Procedural compliance in the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence, impacting the court's discretion in granting bail.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial; failure to adhere to sampling and inventory requirements can undermine the prosecution's case and justify bail.
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural safeguards in drug-related cases, ruling that non-compliance can render evidence inadmissible and affect bail decisions.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in drug seizure cases, ruling that non-compliance can render evidence inadmissible and affect bail decisions.
The court emphasized the necessity of compliance with NDPS Act provisions for admissibility of evidence, granting bail due to procedural lapses and prolonged incarceration.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial; failure to adhere to Section 52A can lead to the inadmissibility of evidence and impact bail decisions.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence, and failure to adhere to these provisions can lead to the grant of bail.
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural safeguards in drug-related cases, granting bail due to significant delays and procedural lapses.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
