SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2441

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, SANDEEP TANEJA
State Of Raj. – Appellant
Versus
Bhai Shankar Lal Jawan Mal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant(s) : Mr. L.K. Purohit

Table of Content
1. central issue of auction terms and legality of subsequent conditions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments against the validity of lease conditions. (Para 4)
3. final decision on dismissal of special appeals. (Para 7)

Judgment :

1. These batch of special appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 08.10.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Hon’ble Court S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3801/1998 (Bhai Shankar Lal Jawan Mal v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) and other connected writ petitions, whereby the writ petitions were allowed. Since all these appeals involve identical facts and issues, they were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment for thse sake of convenience and clarity. The facts of D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 326/2010 (State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Bhai Shankar Lal Jawan Mal) are being treated as the lead case for reference.

“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this appeal may kindly be allowed and the order dtd.8.10.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge be set aside and the writ petition filed by the respondent be ordered to be dismissed.

3. The brief facts giving rise to the present batch of appeals are that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top