SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2489

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI, J.
Rajasthan Ambulance Employees Union Registration No. Rtu/15/2017 Through Its Treasurer Kailash Cha - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Service Group-Iii, Government Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4299 of 2018
Decided On : 21-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vivek Firoda
For the Respondent: Mr. Is Pareek, Mr. Vivek Sharma, Mr. Tanuj Jain

The Rules of 2022 regulate contractual employment, ensuring equal treatment for employees appointed through placement agencies if they meet specified criteria.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Regularization of services of contractual employees - The petitioners sought regularization under the National Rural Health Mission project. The court highlighted the application of the Rules of 2022 as welfare legislation aimed at regulating contractual employment, irrespective of whether the appointment was through direct government engagement or placement agencies. The court found no valid distinction in the treatment of contractual employees based on their appointing body, directing that employees appointed under similar conditions should be considered for benefits under the rules. (Paras 1, 2, 42, 41)

(B) Employment Law - Contractual Employment - The court affirmed that contractual employees appointed through proper advertisement must be treated equally under the Rules of 2022, preventing discriminatory practices by the state. (Paras 30, 41)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners worked in the Integrated Ambulance Services project and sought regularization of their services, which had not been recognized due to procedural discrepancies related to their contractual nature of employment. (Paras 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
The Rules of 2022 intend to regulate all contractual employees and deny differences based solely on the method of hiring. (Paras 30, 41)

Issues: The primary issue addressed was whether contractual employees appointed through placement agencies should receive the same consideration for regularization as those employed directly by the State. (Pars 37, 41)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Rules of 2022 applied retrospectively to all contractual employees meeting set criteria, emphasizing that such legislative frameworks should not create unjust classifications among equals. (Paras 30, 42)

Result: Writ petitions allowed; respondents directed to assess individual cases for regularization under the Rules of 2022.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on appointment criteria and regularization. (Para 4)
3. final order and directives for implementation. (Para 5)

ORDER :

FARJAND ALI, J.

1. The instant Civil Writ Petition have been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for regularization of the services of the petitioners appointed under the Project of National Rural Health Mission.

2. Briefly stated that facts of the case are that the Government of Rajasthan through its Department of Medical, Health and Family Welfare has been operating a professionally managed emergency response service, initially known as the 108 Ambulance Service Project, which was later integrated and renamed as the Integrated Ambulance Services – Dial an Ambulance Service Project from the year 2015-16 onwards. Presently, the project includes 108 Ambulances, 104 Janani Express, and base ambulances. The petitioners have been working in this project on a contractual basis on the post of EMT (GNM). The said project is operated by the National Health Mission (NHM) through a service provider under the control and supervision of the State Health Society and the respective District Health Societies. It is further stated that there exist two sets of contractual employees in the said project— one engaged through RMRS and the other through the service provider both performing similar nature of duties on equivalent posts. On 01.01.2019, the State Government constituted a Committee comprising various Ministers for addressing the issues of contractual employees, including matters relating to wages and regularization. The first meeting of the said Committee was held on 08.01.2019, wherein it was resolved to seek details of all contractual employees working in different departments for the purpose of considering regularization of their services. In furtherance thereof, on 18.01.2019, the Department of Personnel directed all departments to furnish details of contractual employees. Pursuant to this, during the period between 08.01.2019 and 30.01.2019, the Medical Department also sought information from the concerned CMHOs and CMOs regarding contractual employees. Initially, the National Health Mission decided to forward information of all contractual employees, including those working under the Integrated Ambulance Services, whether through placement agencies or service providers, to the Committee. However, on 09.08.2019, the Project Director, NHM issued directions for providing information only in respect of contractual employees directly engaged under NHM and specifically excluded those working through NGOs or service providers. Consequently, while details of contractual employees working under direct agreements were forwarded to the Committee, the information of similarly situated employees like the petitioners, engaged through the service provider in the same project, was not forwarded. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners submitted a representation before the Director, NHM on 18.01.2019, but no action was taken thereon, compelling them to approach this Court by way of filing the present writ petition.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material as made available to the Court.

4. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the instant matter is squarely covered by an order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11737/2024 (Rodu Lal & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan) decided on 26.08.2025 wherein while allowing the bunch of Writ Petitions. The relevant part of the said order is being reproduced as under:-

26. Undisputedly, the petitioners and similarly situated persons have been appointed admittedly on the post created by the Administrative Department with the concurrence of the Finance Department. They are working on contract basis. Therefore, the contention of the respondents that the individuals appointed through the place

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top