SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2560

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
Suraj Mal Meena S/o Nathu Lal Meena – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16031 of 2025
Decided On : 30-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Harendar Neel, Kuldeep Singh Rathore, Amogh Gupta, Pushpendra Singh, Bajrang Sepat, Komal Kumari Giri, Takhat Singh, Ram Pratap Saini, Aamir Khan, Rajendra Singh, Mukesh Meena, Prakash Lamba, Shiv Kumar Sharma, Deepak Kumar Verma, Vishal Kumar, K.N. Sharma, Kuldeep Bhatia, Ayush Singh
For the Respondents: Bhuvnesh Sharma, Parth Sharma, Sunita Meena, Archit Bohra, M.F. Baig

The court directed the Government to consider age relaxation for candidates due to delays and irregularities in the recruitment process, affirming the need for fairness and transparency in public examinations.

Headnote:(A) Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 - Rule 11 and Rule 46 - Recruitment Examination for Sub Inspectors - Petitioners seek age relaxation due to delays in recruitment process - The advertisement dated 17.07.2025 does not provide adequate age relaxation for candidates from earlier recruitment - Court determines that age relaxation can be considered by Government due to uncertainties in prior recruitment. (Paras 2, 10, 21-24)

(B) Administrative Law - Right to Fair Competition - Candidates are entitled to fairness in recruitment processes as per Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution - The court emphasizes the need for transparency and integrity in public examinations to uphold public trust. (Paras 13, 18, 24)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners have applied under multiple recruitment advertisements, raising concerns about age limits, amid legal challenges and allegations of corruption impacting prior selections. (Paras 5, 11, 24)

Findings of Court:
Government is directed to consider age relaxation and a decision is to be reached in eight weeks, while provisional permits for examination participation are affirmed. (Paras 26, 28)

Issues: The core issue is whether the petitioners are entitled to age relaxation for the upcoming examination given past recruitment irregularities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes the need for a fair examination process and affirms the Government's responsibility to consider requests for age relaxation in accordance with legal provisions.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of with directions for the Government to take action within eight weeks.

Table of Content
1. entitlement to age relaxation for examination eligibility. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 19)
2. previous recruitment irregularities affecting current processes. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 18)
3. the need for credible examination processes. (Para 9 , 13 , 14 , 16)
4. public perception and trust in examination systems. (Para 15 , 17)
5. legal grounding for age relaxation considerations. (Para 20 , 21 , 24)
6. judicial discretion in age relaxation is limited. (Para 22 , 23)
7. government directed to consider age relaxation. (Para 25 , 28)

ORDER :

1. These writ petitions were filed by the petitioners who have appeared in Sub Inspector Recruitment Examination, 2021, and further have applied in pursuant to advertisement dated 17.07.2025 issued by RPSC for recruitment on post of Sub Inspectors and Platoon Commander (RAC).

2. The core question before us is whether the petitioners are entitled for appropriate age relaxation so that they may appear in examination to be held in pursuant to advertisement dated 17.07.2025.

3. Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG put in appearance on behalf of Home Department and DGP whereas Mr. M.F. Baig put in appearance on behalf of RPSC in all matters.

4. At the request of learned counsel for the parties, we are deciding these writ petitions at this stage. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. The lead matter is Suraj Mal Meena and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16031/2025 and for ready reference we are reproducing the prayer as under:-

“(i) the impugned advertisement dated 17.07.2025 to the extent of not providing age relaxation to the candidates who appeared in SI Recruitment Examination-2021 in pursuance to advertisement no. 08/2020-21 dated 03.02.2021 may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and same may kindly be quashed and set aside;

(ii) The respondents may kindly be directed by issuing appropriate, writ, order or direction in the nature thereof:

(a) to issue corrigendum advertisement for granting appropriate age relaxation to the candidates who appeared in SI Recruitment Examination 2021 in pursuance to advertisement no. 08/2020-21 dated 03.02.2021.

(b) to grant appropriate age relaxation in the impugned advertisement dated 17.07.2025 to the candidates who appeared in SI Recruitment Examination 2021 in pursuance to advertisement no 08/2020-21 dated 03.02.2021;

(c) to treat humble petitioners eligible and within age limit for the post of Sub- Inspector/Platoon Commander in pursuance to advertisement dated 17.07 2025,

(d) to grant appointment to humble petitioners, if they are found in merit, on the post of Sub-Inspector/Platoon Commander in pursuance to advertisement dated 17.07.2025 with all consequential benefits.

iii) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of the Petitioner.”

6. After filing of these writ petitions and service of notice, an interim order is issued on basis of submissions of learned counsel for the parties and learned counsel appearing for the RPSC whereby a provisional permission has been granted to the petitioners to appear in the examination subject to outcome of these writ petitions. The RPSC has already accepted the application forms of the petitioners who claimed themselves as to be over aged due to time span between two advertisement dated 03.02.2021 and 17.07.2025. This matter can be resolved if the Government allows age relaxation of four years instead of three years as per advertisement dated 17.07.2025. The issue which we are considering is in larger interest but it is not a public interest litigation rather the petitioners are candidates and they are aggrieved persons.

7. The material on record clearly indicate that an interim order is already issued in favour of the petitioners that their candidature shall be considered provisionally by the RPSC and the RPSC considering the provisional candidature shall permit the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top