Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Harish Kumar Yadav S/o Madan Lal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondents.
2. Application No.01/2025 is filed by learned counsel for petitioners to decide all connected matters in accordance with judgment dated 01.05.2025 in SBCWP No. 7728/2025 titled as Leela Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. passed by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur.
3. These writ petitions filed with common question of law, hence tagged together and disposed at this stage with consent of the counsels for the parties as Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC put in appearance on behalf of respondents in all the matters.
4. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC as counsel for respondent.
5. For ready reference, we are reproducing prayer of lead matter Harish Kumar Yadav and Ors. and same is reproduced as under:
“(i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the order dated 15/01/2025 bearing no. F20(492)NHM/HR/CSR 22/RESIGNATION/PART/2024/74 may be quashed qua the petitioners.
(ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may be directed to release the documents of the writ petitioners and relieving orders be issu
Prior appointment conditions are void following new appointments under updated rules, and enforcement of such bonds is deemed irrational and unlawful.
Employment bond conditions from prior appointments become void after subsequent appointments under new rules that do not require such bonds, ensuring no punitive action against employees for non-comp....
The court emphasized the importance of upholding the conditions stipulated in the bond and held that the respondents cannot act in breach of the condition imposed and enforce conditions of the bond b....
The court established that the resolution of 2018 cannot be made applicable to the petitioners retrospectively, and that the respondents cannot change the conditions of the bonds after they were subm....
Employment bonds are enforceable if they reflect reasonable conditions and training investments, but enhancements made retrospectively without consent are not legally sustainable.
A bond obligation does not compel a doctor to serve if they are willing to pay the bond amount, allowing for the issuance of a No Objection Certificate for employment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
