Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Govind Narayan Goyal, S/o. Shri Ram Prasad Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI, J.
1. Manoranjan Kalita vs. State of Assam Crl. Appeal No. 143 of 2010
2. Veer Singh Yadav vs. State of Rajasthan S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 2429/2015
3. G. Narasimha Murthi, Formerly Sub-Registrar, Prakasam Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 1904 of 2005
4. Hukam Singh vs. State of Rajasthan S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 319/2001
5. CBI vs. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal (2014) 14 Supreme Court Cases 295
6. State of Karnataka vs. Ameerjan (2007) 11 Supreme Court cases 273
7. Manish Mathur vs. State of Rajasthan & anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12684 of 2012
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; insufficient evidence leads to the overturning of convictions.
The central legal point established in the given judgment.
Bail applications require careful examination of evidence and circumstances to ensure justice and prevent undue hardship.
The central legal point established in the judgments is the interpretation and application of criminal law provisions.
The central legal point established is the interpretation of statutory provisions under the Criminal Procedure Code to determine liability.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
