Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Mahaveer Prasad Sharma, S/o. Shri Madan Lal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
President, Gram Seva Sahakari Samiti, Geroli – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's requests in the writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. background of employment and termination. (Para 2) |
| 3. labour court's decision on termination legality. (Para 3) |
| 4. status of proceedings after filing. (Para 4) |
| 5. arguments for reinstatement and compensation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 6. issue of reinstatement refusal explored. (Para 8) |
| 7. age and duration of petitioner's service considered. (Para 9) |
| 8. precedents regarding reinstatement and compensation. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 9. availability of position and grounds for reinstatement. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 10. duty of labour court to examine reinstatement grounds. (Para 14) |
| 11. decision to grant relief of reinstatement. (Para 15) |
| 12. provisions regarding backwages responsibilities. (Para 16) |
| 13. final orders and compliance timeline. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER :
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:
“1-Quashed and set aside the award dated 17-08-2022 passed by the learned Labour Court No. 2, Jaipur to the extent of granting lump sum amount 1,25,000/- instead of reinstatement with full back wages continuity. 2-Directed to the respondents to reinstate back the petitioner in service and also paid f
Restoration of employment is mandated when termination is found illegal, unless compelling reasons are provided for denial.
Reinstatement is not automatic for procedural violations under the Industrial Disputes Act; monetary compensation may be granted instead.
Reinstatement is not automatic in cases of delayed disputes; monetary compensation may be awarded instead, especially for procedural violations under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Once violation of Sections 25(F), (G) and (H) of the Industrial Disputes Act is established, reinstatement should follow, as per the decision in Gauri Shanker vs. State of Rajasthan.
The court established that non-compliance with statutory provisions regarding termination under the Industrial Disputes Act leads to invalid termination and entitlement to compensation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
