Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
BIPIN GUPTA
Bhagwati Prasad S/o Shri Khem Raj – Appellant
Versus
Amrit Lal S/o Shobha Lal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of judgment and financial claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. defendant denies loan and signatures. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. evidentiary analysis by the trial court. (Para 7 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. arguments on legitimacy of appellate judgment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. correctness of signature comparison ruling. (Para 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. final ruling and dismissal of plaintiff's suit. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
BIPIN GUPTA, J.
1. The present second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 27.03.1997 whereby the appeal filed by the present-respondent was allowed after setting aside the judgment and decree dated 30.05.1992 and the suit was decreed for Rs.3,000/- along with interest of Rs.1,035/- total Rs.4035/- with interest @12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit.
2. The plaintiff-respondent filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs.4,035/- against the defendant-appellant contending therein that the defendant had taken a loan on 22.03.1984 for the purchase of land. A pronote Exhibit-1 and receipt Exhibit-2 were executed on the same date. The agreed rate of interest was Rs.1.50 per Rs.100/- per month. However, neither the principal amount nor the interest was paid as
The appellate court improperly reversed a trial decision regarding the authenticity of signatures on a pronote without addressing the trial court's valid evidence comparison under Section 73 of the I....
A court may compare handwriting under Section 73 of the Indian Evidence Act without requiring expert testimony, provided there is sufficient circumstantial evidence.
The court upheld the trial Court's judgment confirming the validity of the promissory note and the plaintiff's entitlement to recovery, emphasizing the burden of proof on the plaintiff.
The burden of proof lies with the Plaintiff to establish the execution and validity of the promissory note, and the Court can compare signatures to determine authenticity.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of proving due execution of a promissory note and the presumption under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The judgment ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
