Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
GOPAL LAL – Appellant
Versus
J D A AND ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts concerning acquisition and petition against jda tribunal order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding land title, jurisdiction, and validity of auction. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. principles governing high court's limited supervisory jurisdiction under article 227. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. prior acquisition and absolute ownership supersede subsequent revenue entry disputes. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. precedent affirms that acquisition proceedings invalidate subsequent private title/transfer claims. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. statutory prohibitions on transfer and limited judicial review of factual findings. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. conclusion dismissing petition and mandating finalized transfer of land to bidder. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
ORDER :
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 20.12.2007 passed by the respondent No. 3 - the learned Jaipur Development Authority Appellate Tribunal (for short “JDA Tribunal”) whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against auctioning of his land by respondent No. 1-Jaipur Development Authority was dismissed.
2. The fa
Supervisory jurisdiction is limited to ensuring tribunals act within their authority and does not permit re-assessing evidence. Once land is legally acquired and possession taken by the state, subseq....
The satisfaction of the court regarding prima facie case is crucial for the grant of temporary injunction, and the court may exercise supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to keep subordinate co....
Jurisdiction of Court - Only wrong decision may not be a ground for exercise of jurisdiction under this article unless wrong is referable to grave dereliction of duty, flagrant abuse of power by subo....
Once land has been acquired, it cannot be restored to tenure- holders/persons interested, even if it is not used for the purpose for which it is so acquired. Once possession of land has been taken, i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appeal under Section 20 of the Act of 1975 was not maintainable as the order was passed under Section 9-A, which was non-appealable. The j....
The challenge to the permission under Section 54 of the Ordinance paled into insignificance as the sale deed was already executed and challenged before the Civil Court, and the authorities were not o....
Suit barred due to lack of objection against record of rights; civil court jurisdiction excluded under specific statutory provisions.
Order passed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, is an interim order and it is not required to mention about each and every document produced on record.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited to ensuring lower courts act within their authority, and it cannot interfere merely to correct errors of law or fact. The principles for gra....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
