HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, ACJ., BIPIN GUPTA, J.
Narendra Saini, S/o. Bharat Singh Saini – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport – Respondent
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.256 of 2023 Connected With D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 228 of 2023 D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 230 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 236 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 242 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 244 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 247 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 251 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 257 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 258 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 273 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 281 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 286 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 292 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 322 of 2023 D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 382 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 450 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 463 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 469 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 532 of 2023, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 927 of 2023
Decided On : 21-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing the factual background and statutory requirements for the recruitment of motor vehicle sub-inspector. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding eligibility of degree holders vs. diploma holders under existing statutory rules. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. judicial interpretation of statutory qualifications and limits of judicial review in expanding eligibility. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. prohibition on changing the rules of the game midway through a selection process. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. final order dismissing the appeals and directing the state to proceed with the recruitment process. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT :
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, ACJ.)
1. These D.B. Special Appeals are filed challenging the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby he allowed a bunch of writ petitions on 22.02.2023 and held as under:-
"54. As a result, the instant writ petitions are hereby allowed. The impugned office order dated 15.12.2021 issued by the RSSB is quashed. Respondent-RSSB is directed to prepare the final result on merit for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub-Inspector, pursuant to advertisement dated 24.11.2021, excluding degree holders in automobile/mechanical engineering and the appointment be given by the State as per merit list in accordance with law.
It is made clear that candidate(s) participated in the present recruitment process, possessing degree in automobile/mechanical engineering, if has/have already undergone to the diploma course and had acquired qualification of diploma in automobile/mechanical engineering, as per the prescribed norms of qualification in the advertisement dated 24.11.2021, shall be considered on merits. No costs."
Facts:-
2. The facts of the case are that an Advertisement was issued on 24.11.2021 by the Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as 'RSSB') inviting applications for appointment on the post of Motor Vehicle Sub-Inspector. An office order was issued thereafter on 15.12.2021 by the RSSB enabling the candidates possessing higher qualification than the requisite qualification to apply and to be treated as eligible to participate in the selection process. So far as the Motor Vehicle Sub-Inspector post is concerned, the same is to be filed in terms of the Schedule appended to the Rajasthan Transport Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1963') which provides as under:-


3. Thus, a candidate as per Clause 7, of the Advertisement which was similar to the aforesaid Schedule, was required to possess Class 10th qualification and three years Diploma in Mechanical Engineering/ Automobile Engineering Course from Government of India or State Government or any qualification either of the above disciplines declared equivalent by the Central Government or State Government. The candidate was further required to have one year experience in reputed Automobile Workshop for petrol and diesel engine of Light/ Heavy Vehicle and repairing. He was further required to possess a Driving License of Motorcycle, Heavy Vehicle License and Passenger Vehicle License as issued from competent authority. The level of examination was mentioned to be that of Secondary/ Technical Diploma.
4. The writ petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15.12.2021 issued by the RSSB, whereby, it allowed candidates having higher academic qualifications than the three year mechanical engineering/ automobile engineering diploma to participate in the selection. During the pendency of writ petition, the result was declared.
5. The Department of Personnel (hereinafter referred to as 'DOP') gave its opinion that persons possessing higher qualification are eligible for recruitment on the post of Motor Vehicle Sub-Inspector. Vide order dated 03.08.2022, the same was therefore, also challenged by the writ petitioners by amending the writ petitions.
6. The a
S. Gurmeet Singh And Others vs State And Others
Zahoor Ahmad Rather And Others vs Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad And Others
Ajith K. And Others vs Aneesh K.S. And Others
Prakash Chand Meena And Others vs State of Rajasthan And Others
State of Punjab And Others vs Anita And Others
Anoop M. And Others vs GireeshKumar T.M. And Others
Md. Firoz Mansuri And Others vs The State of Bihar And Others
Devender Bhaskar And Others vs State of Haryana And Others
Chandrakala Trivedi vs State of Rajasthan And Others
Ashok Kumar And Another vs State of Bihar And Others
Union of India And Others vs S. Vinodh Kumar And Others
Prakash Chand Meena And Others vs State of Rajasthan And Others
Marripati Nagaraja And Others vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Devesh Sharma vs Union of India And Others
Tej Prakash Pathak And Others vs Rajasthan High Court And Others
R & P Rules for post clearly provide for recognition of qualification and not higher qualification.
Appointment on Post of Junior Engineer (Electrical) – Minimum qualification for the post cannot be deemed to be only matriculation but rather that only such of those matriculates, or 10+2 pass studen....
The court upheld the constitutionality of recruitment rules limiting Junior Engineer positions to diploma holders, determining that excluding higher qualification holders does not violate constitutio....
The court upheld the constitutionality of recruitment rules that limit eligibility to diploma holders, finding the exclusion of graduates justifiable for maintaining service stability and effective d....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the conflict between the Special Rules and Section 25(b) of the Act, and the court's finding that the fiction under Section 2....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.