SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 414

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Nitin Jain S/o Shri Narendra Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Rajesh Shah, Mahipal Singh, Mahesh Ojha
For the Respondents: Mahaveer Bishnoi, Harshvardhan Singh, Daksh Sharma, Narendra Singh Rajpurohit, Kinshuk Sharma, Rajesh Panwar, Ayush Gehlot, Rakesh Sharma, Arpit Sharma, Nathu Singh Rathore, Rajesh Joshi, Kamini Joshi, Vikas Rathi, Shreyansh Mardia, Roop Kishore Rathi, Himmat Jagga, Tania Chugh, Surendra Singh Choudhary, D.S. Rathore, Jaswant Singh, Priyanshu Gopa, Sunil Joshi, Abhishek Seervi, Jyoti Choudhary, Abhinav Jain, Divik Mathur, Kunal Upadhayay, Shailendra Gwala, Vivek Rathi, Piyush Bhandari, Gajendra Panwar, Akshay Tiwari, Bhawna Tiwari, Manish Tak, Vikash Rathi, Nitin Jain, Piyush Bhandari

Table of Content
1. allegations of unauthorized encroachment in ecologically sensitive zones. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. response of parties citing land status and denial of encroachment. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. judicial assessment of factual findings and nature of dispute. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. environmental conservation and constitutional mandate for esz compliance. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 28)
5. institutional enforcement and mandatory waste management protocols. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31)
6. formal disposal of the public interest litigation. (Para 32)

JUDGMENT :

1. The present Public Interest Litigation concerns allegations of illegal construction, excavation, encroachment, and environmental damage caused by Respondent Nos. 11 and 12, namely Brahma Kumaris Sansthan (hereinafter referred to as “the Sansthan”), within the Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) of Mount Abu. The area falls within and around the Mount Abu Wildlife Sanctuary, which is an ecologically sensitive region protected under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and related notifications. The grievance of the petitioners is that despite repeated complaints, the concerned authori

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top