ORDER :

1. The issue raised in these writ petitions is no more res integra while the learned counsels appearing for the respective writ petitions strongly argue that their cases should be independently examined.

2. The common threat amongst all the writ petitions is that they are essentially challenging the de-limitation which has been done by way of shifting the village from one Panchayat to another, or from one Municipality to another, or reducing the boundaries and also in relation to the notification issued on 30.12.2025.

3. Subsequently, after the issuance of the de-limitation order dated 30.12.2025, some of the petitions were admitted by this Court relating to the notification dated 30.12.2025 and other cases were decided by the Court earlier in the case of Sheela Kumari and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan,  DBCWP No. 7718/2025, decided on 14.11.2025. In a second round of litigation, another co-ordinate Bench decided the case of Sunil Jangid & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DBCWP No. 988/2026, decided on 21.01.2026 alongwith the another case of Jai Singh & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. SLP (C) No. 4977/2026, decided on 16.02.2026 was also considered. Several SLPs were filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court which came before the Bench headed by the Hon’ble Chief Justice who has considered and pass orders dismissing the SLPs. The recent judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Jai Singh (supra)” on 16.02.2026 deserves to be noticed as under:-

“1. We have heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Solicitor General of India for the respondents.

2. It seems to us that the liberty granted by this Court vide order dated 06.01.2026 in SLP (C) No. 34/2026 provides sufficient protection to the Gram Panchayats to approach the Competent Authority for safeguarding their constitutional rights.

3. In view of the above, no further interference is warranted in the impugned judgment passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur.

4. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

5. As a result, the pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.”

4. Keeping in view thereto, it is apparent that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has laid down the finality to the issues and held that no further interference is warranted in the judgment passed by the High Court.

5. In Sunil Jangid (supra) the High Court after considering the law as laid down earlier passed the following order :-

“...18. These writ petitions filed on behalf of the petitioners deserve to be dismissed for the reasons; firstly the issue raised by the petitioners in these writ petitions has been thoroughly considered and decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Sheela Kumari (supra), wherein specific questions were framed and answered by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court which have again been raised by the petitioners in the present writ petitions and therefore, the same require no interference; secondly the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court has been further upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Villagers of Revenue village Singhania and another (supra); thirdly he Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Villagers of Revenue village Singhania and another (supra) has considered the fact that there is no infringement of any constitutional or legally vested right of the petitioners and on that ground the SLP was dismissed and granted liberty to the Gram Panchayat that in case of any difficulty in its management or in providing services to the village residents, the Gram Panchayats will be at liberty to approach the competent authorities to shift the headquarter; fourthly the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Ratan Lal (supra),wherein the same issue was under challenge, the said PIL petition was dismissed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.01.2026 considering the judgment in the matter of Sheela Kumari and villagers of