SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(HP) 30

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh
S.N.PHUKAN,BHAWANI SINGH
PARVEEN BEGUM - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H.P. - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 1316 of 1993
Decided On : 06/08/1995

Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioner:Shri Harish Behal, Advocate. For the respondent(s):Shri M« S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate General.

Headnote:CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - Articles 226/227 - Negligence - Female Child - Left leg has become paralytic - Damages - To assess the exact amount of compensation which may be equivalent to the pain. suffering and loss suffered by the child - Is difficult - No amount of money can restore "the physical condition of child - Yet the Courts has to make an effort to assess compensation which may provide some .relief to child - Parents were advised surgical operation but they could not undertake if for want of money - Directed respondents to pay rupees two lac, fifty thousand to petitioner - Constitution of India, Articles 226/227.

       CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - Articles 226/227 - Medical treatment -Negligence - Damages Principles - No settled formula to determine damages - However, assistance can be taken from principles laid down in cases under the motor accident claims resulting from the negligence of the owners bad drivers and Tort cases - Instead of awarding compensation on various factors, lump sum amount awarded to child 10 enable her to depend on it in her life - Constitution of India, Articles 226/227.

       CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - Articles 226/227 - Negligence - Left leg of eight months female child of petitioner got paralysed - Compensation - Medicine was not defective - Due care was not adopted while injecting the instrument with the result that injury to the sciatic nerve was caused - Contention that many other children were subjected to the same treatment Cannot be accepted III defence since the problem in the case did not arise due to medicine but on account of human lapse - The Diagnosis of PGI is quite clear, the submission that it is not final or that the child had already developed symptoms of disease and the vaccination provocated the problem - Is hardly convincing - Facts demonstrate that the child was not treated properly - Injury the sciatic nerve indicates negligence - When parents complained about problem, no much attention was paid to attend it with the result that child had to be shifted to PGI, be that time the disease had aggravated considerably Respondents should have come forward to accept the lapse, treated the child and paid compensation - But instead of taking that course, they continued to sit over the matter unreasonably thereby making the child and parents to suffer abnormally - Constitution of India, Articles 226/227.

JUDGMENT

Bhawani Singh, J—This writ petition has been registered on the basis of communication from the petitioner to the Chief Justice of this Court. It has been stated that on December 12, 1989, eight months female child of the petitioner—Shaista—was vaccioated against D. P. T. at the District Hospital, Chamba negligently with the result that the left-leg got paralysed. On December 29, 1992. when this fact was brought to the notice of Dr. Narang, Senior Medical Officer, the child was referred to Dr. C. B. Singh, who, after examination, declared her paralytic in left-leg, Certain medicines were prescribed but there was no relief. Again, the child was brought to Chief Medical Officer, Chamba who referred the case to some other doctor whose medicines did not improve the position, Thereafter, the child was referred to Post Graduate Institute, Chandigarh where the doctors, after thorough investigation, opined that the child got paralytic due to wrong vaccination of D. P, T. and could not be cured. After two-three months physiotherapy has to be undertaken at the Institute. This all happened due to the negligence of medical officials at the District Hospital, Chamba The future of her daughter has become dark. Petitioners husband Mirza Akhtar Beg, Clerk in the Electricity Board, made an application to the Medical Department for grant of compensation but no attention was paid to it. The family is not in a position to give the child proper medical treatment.

2. Some time back, her husband made applications to the Chief Medical Officer, Chamba, the Director of Health Services and the Secretary (Health) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh but they did not bother to do something in the matter. The petitioner has claimed compensation from the respondents for the lapse which has resulted in paralysis of the left-leg of the child In support, documents from Post Graduate Institute, Chandigarh have been filed. In one of them, it has been investigated that the child was "Asymptomatic" at the time of vaccination meaning thereby that she was free from any kind of ailment and the problem started on 3rd/ 4th day of the vaccination with mild, moderate fever, weakness of left-leg. It has also been opined that there was sciatic nerve injury after the D, P. T. injection

3. The Director of Health Services, Himachal Pradesh has filed affidavit in this case. It has been admitted that the child was vaccinated for D. P. T. at the District Hospital, Chamba on December 12, 1989 but it has been denied that she was negligently vaccinated by the staff The Chief Medical Officer, Charoba got the matter inquired into from the Medical Officer (Health), Chamba who has pointed out (Annexure RA) that Post Graduate Institute, Chandigarh report did not indicate final diagnosis nor the cause for the problem could otherwise be established. The child did not developed paralysis due to immunisation of DP T, therefore, negligence on the part of the Medical Officer of District Hospital, Chamba could not be there. It has been pointed out that in all, twelve children including this child were immunised on December 12, 1989 and none developed paralysis or any other complication as no complaint had been received from them.

4. Shri Harish Behal was appointed by the Court to appear for the petitioner under the Legal Aid Rules since the petitioner had stated in her petition that on account of financial difficulties, she was not in a position to appear in the Court personally Shri Behal put up the case of the petitioner brilliantly Learned Counsel contended that the child was asymptomatic at the time of vaccination, meaning thereby that she was without any symptom of any disease. The problem developed on the 3rd/ 4th day of the injection when the child had mild, moderate fever and weak ness of left-leg Post Graduate Institute, Chandigarh establishes that the child suffered due to the injection administered by the hospital. It was done carelessly and negligently, that is why, sciatic ne


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top