SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(HP) 1075

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sanjay Karol & P.S. Rana, JJ.
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Vs.
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeals No. 662 of 2008 & 1 of 2009
Decided On : 4.9.2014

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Advocate & Mr. Anup Chitkara, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. B.S. Parmar and Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Additional Advocates General & Mr. Vikram Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Karol, J.

1. Both these appeals, arising out of common judgment passed by the trial Court, are being disposed of as such.

2. Appellants-convict Anil Kumar and Sanjay Rana, hereinafter referred to as the accused, have assailed the judgment dated 4.10.2008, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sirmour District at Nahan, Himachal Pradesh, in Sessions Trial No. 2-N/7 of 2007, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Sanjay Rana and another, whereby they stand convicted for having committed offences punishable under the provisions of Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced both of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- each, in relation to offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code; and rigorous imprisonment for ten years and pay fine of Rs. 20,000/- each, in relation to offence punishable under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code, and in default of payment of fine to further undergo imprisonment for a period of one year each.

3. As the record reveals, it is the case of prosecution that on 22.8.2006, Jaswant Singh (PW-25), posted as Chowkidar in the Forest Department, spotted a dead body. He immediately informed Ms Reeta Devi (PW-3), Pradhan of the concerned Gram Panchayat Haripul Khol, who visited the spot and telephonically informed the police at Police Post Majra, District Sirmaur (H.P.) about the same. ASI Tara Chand (PW-1), visited the spot, conducted spot investigation, and sent Rukka (Ex. PW-1/A), on the basis of which FIR No.32/06, dated 22.8.2006 (Ex. PW-29/G), under the provisions of Sections 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25-54-59 of the Arms Act, was registered at Police Station, Paonta Sahib (H.P.) by Inspector Khazana Ram (PW-29). Ram Singh (PW-2), who also had independently spotted the dead body same day, and had informed Ms Reeta Devi (PW-3) about the same, was associated by ASI Tara Chand as a witness. From the clothes of deceased, two chits were recovered and taken into possession vide Memo dated 22.8.2006 (Ex. PW-1/D). Two empty cartridges (Ex.P-2 & P-3) were found and recovered from the spot. Inquest report (Ex. PW-1/E) was prepared and dead body sent for postmortem, which was conducted by Dr. Piyush Kapila (PW-18), who issued postmortem report dated 24.8.2006 (Ex. PW-18/A), based on reports dated 13.6.2006 (Ex. PA), and 28.12.2006 (Ex. PB and PC) of the Chemical Examiner. Doctor opined that deceased had died as a result of injuries sustained by a fire arm (rifle). Viscera of the deceased brought by Constable Krishna Nand (PW-5), deposited with MHC Raghubir Singh (PW-22) as also other seized articles were sent for chemical analysis by Inspector Narveer Singh (PW-31), through LHC Naresh Kumar (PW-16) to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Junga.

4. Independently on 22.8.2006 itself, vehicle bearing No. HR-70-2394 (INDICA) was recovered near the PNT Ground Saharanpur, within the jurisdiction of Police Station, Saharanpur (UP). This was so done by SI Shyo Raj (PW-21), Police Station, Prabhari Control Room, District Bijnaur (UP).

5. Since 19th of August, 2008, Rajesh Kumar (deceased) was found missing from home, as such, when his brother Parvesh Kumar (PW-4) called Naresh Kumar (PW- 23), he was told that on 19.8.2006 Rajesh Kumar had telephonically informed that he would be visiting his girl friend, i.e. the prosecutrix (PW-6). On 21.8.2006, both Parvesh Kumar and Naresh Kumar contacted the prosecutrix, who informed them that she never met Rajesh Kumar either on 19th or thereafter. Parvesh Kumar, who is a police official, took up the matter with the concerned police officials and on 21.8.2006 lodged missing report with the concerned Police Station. On 22.8.2006, Parvesh Kumar learnt about recovery of a dead body, which he identified it to be that of Rajesh Kumar, vide Memo (Ex. PW-1/H), dated 24.8.2006. Dead body was totally mutil







































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

gpt-4

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top