IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA, AT SHIMLA
P.S.Rana, J.
Babu Ram son of Mushu Ram & Anr. - Appellants
Vs.
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr.Appeal No. 4230 of 2013
Decided On : 22.5.2015
Kidnapping - Criminal Conspiracy - Sections 363, 366, 120-B, 376 IPC - The court affirmed the judgment and sentence passed by the trial court, convicting the accused persons for kidnapping, criminal conspiracy, and rape. The court found the testimony of the minor prosecutrix to be trustworthy and reliable, corroborated by medical evidence and public documents showing her age. The court rejected the defense's arguments regarding consent and age, holding that the theory of consent is not applicable to a minor prosecutrix and that the accused failed to provide positive, cogent, and reliable evidence to rebut the public documents. The court also found the criminal conspiracy and kidnapping charges to be proved beyond reasonable doubt based on the circumstantial and direct evidence presented.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution alleged that the accused persons kidnapped a minor prosecutrix with the intention to force her into marriage. The minor prosecutrix was taken to various locations, including Shimla, and was subjected to sexual intercourse by one of the accused. The father of the prosecutrix reported the matter to the police, leading to the arrest and subsequent conviction of the accused.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the testimony of the minor prosecutrix to be trustworthy and reliable, corroborated by medical evidence and public documents showing her age. The court rejected the defense's arguments regarding consent and age, holding that the theory of consent is not applicable to a minor prosecutrix and that the accused failed to provide positive, cogent, and reliable evidence to rebut the public documents. The court also found the criminal conspiracy and kidnapping charges to be proved beyond reasonable doubt based on the circumstantial and direct evidence presented.
Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of the minor prosecutrix's testimony, the applicability of consent and age in the case, and the proof of criminal conspiracy and kidnapping charges against the accused.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the testimony of the minor prosecutrix, supported by medical evidence and public documents, was sufficient to convict the accused. The court also emphasized that the theory of consent is not applicable to a minor prosecutrix and that public documents prepared by public officials in discharge of their official duties are relevant facts under the Indian Evidence Act. Additionally, the court found the criminal conspiracy and kidnapping charges to be proved beyond reasonable doubt based on the circumstantial and direct evidence presented.
Final Decision: The appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed, and the judgment and sentence passed by the trial court were affirmed. The court held that no miscarriage of justice had been caused to the appellants and ordered the file to be sent back to the trial court along with a certified copy of the judgment.
Present appeal is filed against the judgment and sentence passed by learned Sessions Judge Mandi in Sessions Trial No 27 of 2007 titled State vs. Babu Ram and others decided on dated 24.4.2012.
Brief facts of the case as alleged by the prosecution:-
2. It is alleged by the prosecution that on dated 9.7.2007 at Dehar accused persons kidnapped minor prosecutrix in vehicle No. HP-03(T)-4217 with intention to force her to marry with co-accused Babu Ram. It is alleged by prosecution that in pursuance of criminal conspiracy accused persons kidnapped minor prosecutrix aged 15½ years out of lawful guardianship of father of prosecutrix without his consent. It is further alleged by prosecution that co-accused Hem Lata called father of minor prosecutrix on dated 9.7.2007 and told the father of minor prosecutrix to send minor prosecutrix to tailoring centre at Dehar. It is alleged by prosecution that co-accused Hem Lata also personally talked to minor prosecutrix and asked her to come to Dehar tailoring centre. It is alleged by prosecution that thereafter minor prosecutrix went to Dehar and co-accused Hem Lata met the minor prosecutrix at Sheetla temple and took the minor prosecutrix towards bridge. It is also alleged by prosecution that at bridge a white coloured car came and minor prosecutrix was pushed inside the car. It is alleged by prosecution that co-accused Hem Lata gagged the mouth of prosecutrix and threatened the minor prosecutrix to kill her in case she would raise hue and cry. It is alleged by prosecution that thereafter minor prosecutrix was took to Shimla and thereafter co-accused Hem Lata pursuaded the minor prosecutrix to marry with co-accused Babu Ram. It is alleged by prosecution that thereafter minor prosecutrix was brought to Court and her age was wrongly disclosed and documents relating to marriage were prepared with co-accused Babu Ram. It is alleged by prosecution that thereafter co-accused Babu Ram and Hem Lata took the minor prosecutrix to their village Barara Tehsil Sunni and prosecutrix was kept in the house w.e.f. 10.7.2007 till 15.7.2007. It is alleged by prosecution that thereafter in village Barara Tehsil Sunni minor prosecutrix was raped by co-accused Babu Ram. It is alleged by prosecution that when minor prosecutrix did not return to her residential house Hari Dass filed a criminal complaint in P.P. Salapar. It is alleged by prosecution that FIR Ext.PW19/A was recorded and thereafter investigation was started and site plan Ext.PW18/A was prepared and photographs Ext.PW7/A-1 to Ext.PW7/A-4 along with negatives Ext.PW7/A-5 to Ext.PW7/A-8 prepared. It is further alleged by prosecution that thereafter certified copy of family register Ext.PW4/A and copy of birth and deaths register Ext.PW4/B were obtained by Investigating Agency. It is alleged by prosecution that thereafter minor prosecutrix was brought to Salapar on dated 16.7.2007. It is also alleged by prosecution that medical examination of prosecutrix was conducted and as per opinion of medical officer the minor prosecutrix was exposed to sexual intercourse. It is alleged by prosecution that MLC Ext.PW12/A was obtained and thereafter minor prosecutrix was handed over to her parents vide memo Ext.PW1/C. It is alleged by prosecution that application was filed for medical examination of co-accused Babu Ram and thereafter medical examination of co-accused Babu Ram was conducted and as per medical opinion it was found that co-accused Babu Ram was capable of performing sexual intercourse. It is alleged by prosecution that thereafter prosecutrix was referred to zonal hospital Mandi for second opinion where Dr. Namita Verma had given opinion that possibility of sexual intercourse could not be ruled out. It is alleged by prosecution that thereafter vehicle having registration No. HP-03(T)-4217 was seized along with documents vide seizure memo Ext.PW6/
Rajesh Patel vs. State of Jharkhand
Bodhisattwa Gautam vs. Miss Subhra Chakraborty
State of Punjab vs. Gurmit Singh and others
State of H.P. vs. Lekh Raj and another
Madan Gopal Kakkad Vs. Naval Dubey and another
State of Maharashtra vs. Chander Prakash
Pratapbhai Hamirbhai Solanki vs. State of Gujarat
Thakorlal D. Vadgama vs. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.