MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Kausal Air Products – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, J. :
” Petitioner has sought writ of mandamus commanding respondent No. 2 to open the technical bid of the petitioner and also to allow the petitioner to participate in the financial bid on the grounds taken in the writ petition, which can be apply and precisely enumerated as under :
2. Respondent No. 2 issued notice inviting tenders, which was published in various newspapers and all the eligible contractors/persons had to submit tenders by or before 18th June, 2014 upto 2.00 p.m. Many persons applied, but the entire process was recalled, fresh advertisement notice was issued and the last date for submission of tender documents was fixed as 12th August, 2014. The entire process was again recalled and fresh advertisement notice was issued, in terms of which the tender documents were to be submitted by or before 15th September, 2014. Tenders were submitted. The petitioner also submitted the tender documents, but respondent No. 2 refused to accept the same, constraining the writ petitioner to make a correspondence with respondent No. 1 and the Hon” ble Minister concerned through e-mail on 16th September, 2014. Respondents have not opened the tender document
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Association of Registration Plates v. Union of India and others
Michigan Rubber (India) Limited v. State of Karnataka and others
Pathan Mohammed Suleman Rehmatkhan v. State of Gujarat and others
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India and Ors. (1979) 3 SCC 489
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.