SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 478

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & Dipak Misra, JJ.
Arun Kumar Agrawal - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others - Respondents
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 69 OF 2012
Decided On : May 09, 2013

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32 – Transaction – Contract - Public Interest Litigation has challenged approval granted by Government of India acquisition of majority stake in Cairn India Limited for billion and also for direction to Oil and Natural Gas Corporation of India exercise its right of pre emption over sale of shares of CIL on same terms without causing any loss or profit to Cairn Energy and also for direction to CBI to investigate reasons for ONGC Government of India Undertaking in not exercising their legal rights Right of First Refusal and giving clearance to CAIRN Vedanta Deal on basis of existing right to share royalty on pro rata basis and also for consequential reliefs – Held, CAG’s report is always subject to parliamentary debates and possible that PAC can accept ministry’s objection to CAG report or reject report of CAG – CAG indisputably is an independent constitutional functionary Parliament to decide after receiving report PAC to make its comments on CAG’s report – Court point out that since report is from constitutional functionary commands respect and cannot be brushed aside as such is equally important to examine comments respective ministries have to offer on CAG’s report - Ministry can always point out there is any mistake in CAG’s report or CAG has inappropriately appreciated various issues - For instance Cout cannot as such accept CAG report in instance case - PSC permits extension of exploration period for three years from the end of the seven year period prescribed in Article 2.2. The period extended in pursuance to Article expired - CAG, it is seen has assumed that any exploration carried out beyond period was beyond provision of PSC - Article specifically contemplates extension of exploration phase pursuant to terms of PSC - Last part of Article permits further extension of exploration period for period of months is factually and legally incorrect to suggest that any exploration carried out beyond was beyond provision of PSC - CAG views on that aspect cannot be accepted – Petition dismissed

JUDGMENT

K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

1. Petitioner, through this Public Interest Litigation, has challenged the approval granted by the Government of India dated 24.1.2012 for the acquisition of majority stake in Cairn India Limited (CIL) for US $8.48 billion and also for a direction to the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation of India (ONGC) to exercise its right of pre-emption over sale of shares of CIL on the same terms without causing any loss or profit to the Cairn Energy, and also for a direction to CBI to investigate the reasons for ONGC, a Government of India Undertaking, in not exercising their legal rights under the Right of First Refusal (RoFR) and giving clearance to the CAIRN – Vedanta Deal on the basis of the existing right to share the royalty and cess on pro-rata basis and also for the consequential reliefs.

FACTS

2. Government of India had, earlier, retained the exclusive privilege for mining of hydrocarbons, which was carried out on nomination basis through the statutory corporations like ONGC. The need for maximising domestic exploration of production of oil led to the Government of India encouraging private sector participation in the exploration of oil and natural gas from the year 1980. Rajasthan Block (RJ-ON-90/1) was one of the Pre-New Energy Licensing Policy (Pre-NELP) exploration block offered by a Competitive Building Mechanism. The said block was offered in the 4th round of Pre-NELP regime to M/s. Shell India in execution of a Production Sharing Contract (PSC) on 15.5.1995. Since the exploration licence for Rajasthan Block was held by ONGC, the PSC had three parties, (a) Government of India, (b) the bidder, M/s. Shell India Production Development BV (Shell) and (c) the licensee ONGC. PSC was entered into for the exploration and exploitation of crude oil and natural gas. As per the PSC, ONGC is holding 30% of the participating interest (PI) in the development or within the contract area since 13.1.2005.

3. Shell failed to make any commercial discovery even after investing US$ 9 million and was contemplating to part with its interest in the PSC. Consequently, Cairn Energy India Pvt. Ltd. (CEIL) acquired 27.5% of Shell’s interest under the contract with effect from 27.1.1999 and a further 22.5% with effect from 20.12.1999. Cairn Energy Hydrocarbons Ltd. (CEHL) acquired Shell’s remaining 50% interest under the contract with effect from 23.6.2003. CEIL and CEHL, subsidiary companies of CAIRN, have accordingly succeeded Shell as parties to the aforementioned contract and together became the holder of the 70% of the PI.

4. CIL is a company incorporated under the laws of India and listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange. CAIRN Energy PLC UK (CAIRN) is incorporated under the laws of UK, listed on London Stock Exchange and is a majority shareholder in CIL having 62.4% equity stake in it through its wholly owned subsidiary, CAIRN UK Holdings Limited. Upon its acquisition of 50%, Shell’s interest under the contract, CEIL became the operator under the operating agreement with effect from 1.1.2000.

5. CIL and its subsidiary have interests in the seven exploratory blocks (out of which Block VN-ONN-2003/1 has already been relinquished) and three producing fields in India and another exploration block in Sri Lanka as per the following details:

- 70% Participating Interest (PI) & operatorship in producing Development Areas of RJ-ON-90/1 (ONGC 30%),

- 22.50% PI in producing Ravva Field & Operatorship (ONGC 40%),

- 40% IP & Operatorship in producing fields of CB-OS/2 Block & (ONGC 50%); and

- PI in eight other Blocks in India and Sri Lanka where there is currently no production; out of these ONGC has PI in 5 Blocks.

6. CAIRN, vide its letter dated 16.8.2010, informed ONGC that it had announced disposal of its substantial shareholding in CIL to Vedanta. ONGC had a PI in number of blocks/fields where CAIRN is op

































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top