SANJAY KAROL
Suman Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Salochna – Respondent
Sanjay Karol, J.
Plaintiffs’ application, so filed under the provisions of Sections 151, 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking amendment of the judgment and decree dated 31.07.1997 passed by Sub-Judge (I) Dharamshala in Civil Suit No. 154/91, titled as Madan Lal & others Versus Nikko Ram & others, as affirmed/amended vide judgment and decree dated 14.07.1998, passed by learned District Judge, Dharamshala, in Civil Appeal No. 77-D/XIII-1997, titled as Nikko Ram & others Versus Madan Lal & others, stands rejected by the Court below vide order dated 12.01.2004 in Civil Misc. Application No. 303/03, titled as Madan Lal & others Versus Nikko Ram & others.
2. Operative portion of the decree sheet dated 31.07.1997 reads as under:-
“…the suit of the plaintiffs succeeds and is decreed by passing a decree to the effect that the plaintiffs have become owner of the suit land comprised in Khata No. 121, Khatauni No. 302, Khasra Nos. 663, 664, Kita 2 measuring 0-33-43 hects., land revenue Rs.3.22, jamabandi for the year 1984-85, situated at Mohal Kadyal Mauza Lunj, Tehsil & District Kangra, by way of adverse possession and defendants are restrained from causing any interfere
Thirugnanavalli Ammal v. P. Venugopala Pillai
Bai Shakriben v. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Lakshmi Ram Bhuyan Versus Hari Prasad Bhuyan and others
S. Satnam Singh and others Versus Surender Kaur and another
Niyamat Ali Molla Versus Sonargon Housing Cooperative Society Ltd. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.