TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, J.

1. This revision has been filed by the tenant against the order of his eviction, concurrently passed by both the learned authorities below, from the demised premises comprising of a shop, situated in Ward No.7, Up Mohal Bhawan, Mauja Ujjain, Tehsil and District Kangra, H.P.

2. The parties shall be referred to as the landlord and tenant.

3. The landlord filed an eviction petition against the tenant mainly on the three grounds - (i) arrears of rent (ii) subletting and (iii) bonafide requirement of his son, who is an Advocate.

4. It is not in dispute that the only subsisting ground for eviction is the bona fide requirement, which has been upheld by both the learned authorities below.

5. The premises in question were let out to the tenant on monthly rental of Rs.500/- in September 1992, which was subsequently enhanced to Rs.680/- w.e.f January 2017. It was averred that son of the landlord Mr. Rajnish Sharma is an Advocate by profession and working with one Mr. S.C.Uppal, Advocate and, thus, the demised premises were required for setting up of office of Mr. Rajnish Sharma.

6. The tenant contested this ground that son of the landlord was having an office in t