TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Gurminder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jaspal Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. - The appellant is the plaintiff, who after having lost before both the learned Courts below has filed this Regular Second Appeal. The parties shall be referred to as the ''plaintiff'' and the ''defendants''.
2. This appeal emanates from the suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants No.1 and 2 and proforma defendants No.3 and 4. It was averred that Waryam Singh S/o Sh. Gainda Singh was the father of plaintiff and defendants No.3 and 4, was owner of the land comprised in Khata Khatauni No.37/61, Kite 4 measuring 28-7 bighas in village Bhungarni and was holding this property as coparcenary joint Hindu family property. In order to ensure that the property comes to his male issues, he made a gift in favour of his four sons on the basis of which mutation No. 262 was attested on 28.2.1973. Waryam Singh had another son Inderjeet Singh, who was bachelor and unfortunately expired and later on the wife of Waryam Singh i.e. mother of the plaintiff and proforma defendants No. 3 and 4 got the mutation of Inderjeet Singh reviewed in her name and she alone succeeded to his estate. It was averred that after
Arulvelu and another Vs. State Represented by the Public Prosecutor and another
Damodar Lal vs.Sohan Devi and others
Gamini Bala Koteswara Rao Vs. State of A.P.
Guran Ditta & Anr. Vs. T. Ram Ditta
Kuldeep Singh Vs. Commr. of Police
Kulwant Kaur Vs. Gurdial Singh Mann
M. S. Narayanagouda Vs. Girijamma & Another
Ningawwa Vs. Byrappa Shiddappa Hireknrabar
Rajinder Kumar Kindra Vs. Delhi Admn.
S.R. Tiwari Vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.