ANOOP CHITKARA
Mahender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara, J.
COURT PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE
1. On the allegations made by a girl, aged 15 years, against the petitioner of having coitus with her in the end of May 2013, by entering her home, and also raping her in forest on 30th June 2013, when she was returning from school, the police registered FIR No. 82 of 2013, dated 19.07.2013, under Sections 376, 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, (IPC), and 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, in Police Station Gohar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, disclosing cognizable and non-bailable offences.
2. The Police conducted the investigation, took the victim for her medical examination, got her statement recorded under S. 164 CrPC, but failed to nab the accused. Subsequently, the Police filed a charge sheet without arresting the accused. After taking cognizance of the offence, the Court issued Non-bailable Warrants, and upon its non-execution, allowed the application of the prosecution and proceeded against the accused under Section 82 CrPC, and thus, vide order dated 24.12.2013, declared the petitioner as a proclaimed offender. Per Paragraph 7 of the bail petition, after that Learned Ad
Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and others v. State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.