SANDEEP SHARMA
Krishan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
1. By way of present petition filed under S.439 CrPC, prayer has been made on behalf of the bail petitioner namely Krishan Kumar, who is behind the bars for more than two years, for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 204, dated 15.11.2018, registered at Police Station Baijnath, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh under Ss. 302, 324 and 323 IPC.
2. Status report filed by the respondent-State reveals that on 15.11.2018, complainant Vishal got his statement recorded under S.154 CrPC, alleging therein that on 14.11.2018, he, alongwith deceased Shubham, after having finished their welding work at the residence of Pradeep Kumar resident of Chobu, went to Mahakal for purchasing a few things. He alleged that he purchased 2 kg chicken, one bottle of whisky, ½ kg tomatoes, ½ kg onion and few disposable classes and thereafter came to Balh, where persons namely Shubham, Krishan Kumar and Malkeet were also present. Subsequently person namely Vinod Rana, Pradeep JE and Sanjeev also came to the house of Malkeet alias Nikku. Complainant alleged that after some time, person namely Pradeep, Vinod Rana and JE went away, whereas, he alongwith Sanjeev, deceased Shubham, stayed in
Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee v. Union of India
Shaheen Welfare Assn. v. Union of India
Paramjit Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Manoranjana Sinh alias Gupta versus CBI
Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2012) 1 SCC 40
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar versus Ashis Chatterjee and another (2010) 14 SCC 496
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.