SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1024

A.M.AHMADI, B.L.HANSARIA
SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

AHMADI, J.

( 1 ) THE Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985, hereinafter alluded to as "the Act", was enacted inter alia to make stringent provisions for the control and regulation of operations relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and for matters connected therewith. The enactment received the Presidents assent on 16/9/1985. The dictionary of the Act is to be found in Section 2 thereof. Section 2 (xxix) says that words and expressions used in the Act and not defined but defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, hereinafter called "the Code", shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Code. The Act is divided into six Ch. comprising 83 sections. Since in the instant case we are concerned with only a few provisions we need not examine the scheme of the Act. We had an occasion to examine the scheme of the Act in some detail in Raj Kumar Karwal v. Union of India. Ch. IV defines the offences and prescribes stringent punishments, with minimum punishments and fines for them. For certain offences the punishment prescribed can extend to rigorous imprisonment for 20 years and a fine of Rupees two lakhs, with a minimum rigorous i
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top