IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA, JJ.
Dharam Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh University – Respondent
CWP No.722 of 2021
Decided on : 04-05-2021
Universities and Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018 - Education and University - Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges - Whether a qualification acquired by a candidate subsequent to prescribed date can be taken into consideration to adjudge eligibility or acquisition of higher qualification is the moot question to be decided in the instant petition.
Finding of the court: Court do not find any merit in this contention for simple reason that due to outbreak of Covid-19 Pandemic State Government had imposed lockdown and because of which there were travelling and movement - University has extended time limit of advertisement for reasons stated above does not mean that University is bound to take into consideration higher/additional qualification that the applicants may have acquired after issuance of original advertisement - No merits.
Result: Petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge
Whether a qualification acquired by a candidate subsequent to the prescribed date can be taken into consideration to adjudge the eligibility or acquisition of higher qualification is the moot question to be decided in the instant petition?
2. The respondent-University issued an Advertisement No.Rectt.-17/2019 dated 30.12.2019 for filling up various teaching and administrative posts through direct recruitment. In terms of the advertisement, the crucial date i.e. the closing date for determining the eligibility of all candidates in respect of essential qualification(s) and experience, if any, etc. was 30.01.2020; as is evident from important Instruction No.2 appended with the advertisement which reads as under:-
3. The petitioner is an applicant for the post of Assistant Professor in Computer Science (BCA/MCA/PGDCA) in ICDEOL, Himachal Pradesh University, for which post the minimum qualification is as per the UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018 (hereinafter to be called as ‘UGC Regulations, 2018’).
4. As per the decision taken in the meetings of the Executive Council held on 10.06.1981 and 12.06.1981, an advertisement is to be operational upto one year. However, in the instant case, the time limit for the advertisement was extended by another six months upto 30th June, 2021.
5. It is the admitted case of the parties that as on the closing date for determining the eligibility of candidates i.e. 30.01.2020, the petitioner had not been awarded Ph.D. Degree as the same was obtained by him only in the month of December, 2020.
6. However, the petitioner made a representation to the respondent-University to consider the additional higher qualification obtained by him after the closing date as per the advertisement, but the same was rejected vide communication dated 30.01.2021 (Annexure P-5) and aggrieved thereby the petitioner has filed the instant petition for grant of the following relief:-
7. The respondent has filed its reply wherein it is stated that due to outbreak of Covid-19 Pandemic, the State Government imposed lockdown and, therefore, the recruitment process on the basis of the advertisement could not be started till mid August, 2020. Resultantly, the selection process on all the advertised posts could not be completed within the prescribed validity period of advertisement
Ashok Kumar Sharma and others vs. Chander Shekhar and another (1997) 4 SCC 18
Rekha Chaturvedi (Smt.) v. University of Rajasthan and others 1993 Supp3 SCC 168
Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. 2013 (10) Scale 42
State of Punjab and Ors. v. Surinder Kumar and Ors.
U.P. Public Service Commission, U.P., Allahabad and Anr. v. Alpana
Dr. M.V. Nair v. Union of India and Ors.
Smt. Harpal Kaur Chahal v. Director, Punjab Instructions, Punjab and Anr.
Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan
A.P. Public Service Commission v. B. Surat Chandra
Bhupinderpal Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Gujarat v. Arvind Kumar T. Tiwari
Pramod Kumar v. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission
State of Orissa v. Mamta Mohanty
Bhupinderpal Singh vs. State of Punjab (2000) 5 SCC 262; (AIR 2000 SC 2011: 2000 AIR SCW 1888
District Collector and Chairman
M. V. Nair (Dr.) vs. Union of India (1993) 2 SCC 429:(1993) AIR SCW 1412)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.