SANDEEP SHARMA
Rajesh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Sandeep Sharma, J.
1. Petitioner was initially engaged on 31 March, 2001 on contract basis in the respondent-Corporation, as is evident from the appointment letter (Annexure P-4). Pursuant to aforesaid appointment, petitioner gave his joining as Clerk on 31.3.2001, as is evident from joining report (Annexure P-5). Pleadings adduced on record by the parties to the lis clearly reveals that aforesaid contract of the petitioner came to be renewed periodically. The copies of the renewal of contract are attached collectively as Annexure P-6 with the petition. While petitioner was rendering his services as Clerk on contract basis, respondent-State repeatedly promulgated policy for regularization of contract employees in the Government Department. Though, petitioner, who had been rendering services of Clerk continuously since his appointment on 31.3.2001 had become eligible for regularization in terms of the policy dated 29.8.2009 framed by the State Government, but fact remains that his case was not considered for regularization. Again in the year 2009 and 2021 Government of Himachal Pradesh took policy decision (Annexures P-7 and P-8) for regularization of contract employees workin
Bhagwati Prasad v. Delhi State Mineral Development Corporation (1990) 1 SCC 361 : AIR 1990 SC 371
B.N. Saxena v. New Delhi Municipal Committee and others
State of U.P. v. J.P. Chaurasia (1989) 1 SCC 121 : AIR 1989 SC 19
Gujarat Agriculture University v. Rathod Labhu Bechar and others (2001) 3 SCC 574 : AIR 2001 SC 706
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.