VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Kanta Devi, W/o. Sh. Roop Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh, Through Secretary Home, Shimla – Respondent
ORDER :
In the instant petition, order dated 7.12.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. VI, Shimla in Case No. 429 of 2018, has been assailed by petitioners, whereby on the basis of final report submitted by police under Section 173 of Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘Cr.PC), cognizance has been taken by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class against the petitioners for an offence alleged to have been committed under Section 188 of IPC read with Section 34 IPC.
2. It is the case of prosecution that on 15.7.2018, on the basis of statement of Smt. Usha Sharma, complainant, recorded by Investigating Officer, a case under Section 188 read with Section 34 IPC was registered by police for violation of order passed by Municipal Corporation Shimla, restraining the petitioners from carrying out construction and repair of building.
3. Learned counsel for petitioners has submitted that in view of provisions of Section 195 of Cr.P.C., cognizance of offence committed under Section 188 of IPC can only be taken on the basis of complaint, made in writing, of public servant concerned or some other public servant administratively superior to him, whereas, in present ca
Daulat Ram vs. State of Punjab
C. Muniappan and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Govind Mehta v. The State of Bihar
Patel Laljibhai Somabhai v. The State of Gujarat
Surjit Singh & Ors. v. Balbir Singh
State of Punjab v. Raj Singh & Anr.
K. Vengadachalam v. K.C. Palanisamy & Ors.
Basir-ul-Haq & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal
Durgacharan Naik & Ors. v. State of Orissa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.