SANDEEP SHARMA
State Bank of India, Palampur – Appellant
Versus
Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, lays challenge to order dated 13.05.2021 (Annexure P-6), whereby Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (for short ‘DRAT’) erroneously without there being any jurisdiction entertained the misc. Application No.15 of 2021, having been filed by respondents No.2 and 3 (Annexure P-3), praying therein for initiation of appropriate action against the erring bank officials on account of their having fraudulently credited the amount in the account of auction purchaser
2. On 18.05.2021, Division Bench of this Court while issuing notice to the respondents, returnable for 5th July, 2021, admitted the petition for hearing and stayed the proceedings before Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi in Misc. Application No.15 of 2021 (Annexure P-6).
3. On 28.07.2021, Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and stated that he has been appointed as legal aid counsel on behalf of respondent No.2, whereas despite service, respondent No.3 did not come present, but yet this Court with a view to afford due opportunity of being heard to respondents No.2 and 3, adjourned the matter for today’s
Upper Doab Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Shahdara (Delhi) Saharanpur Light Rly. Co. Ltd. [AIR 1963 SC 217]
Union of India v. Orient Paper and Industries Limited [(2009)16 SCC 286]
Union of India v. R. Gandhi, President
Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Shyam Sunder Jhunjhunwala [AIR 1961 SC 1669]
Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Lakshmi Chand[AIR 1963 SC 677]
Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. P.N. Sharma[AIR 1965 SC 1595]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.