SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 833

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
Virender Kansal, S/o. Sh. Sant Ram Kansal & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh, Through Drugs Inspector, District Sirmour, H.P. - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Petition (Main) U/s 482 CRPC No. 362 of 2019
Decided On : 06-09-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijay Kumar Arora.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar and Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Additional Advocates General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Mr. Kamal Kishore and Mr. Narinder Thakur, Deputy Advocates General.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure code, 1973 – Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules, 1945 - Section 482 - Ss. 18(a)(i) r/w S.17, 27 (d) - Quashing of complaint - Learned court proceeded to order summoning of petitioners in complaint - Drug Inspector claimed that though supply order for supply of drug namely Dicyclomine was placed with M/s Novex Healthcare Parwanoo, but since such medicine came to be manufactured by M/s Therawin Formulations, petitioners are also liable for action under appropriate provisions of Act - Tablets of Dicyclomine were of standard quality but since there was mistake in printing of wrapper containing aforesaid tablets of Dicyclomine, whereupon contents of Dexamethasone were also shown to be present in tablets of Dicyclomine, complaint under S.18(a)(i) read with S.17 of Act came to be instituted against persons named in complaint – Held, while summoning, two witnesses are examined by court in support of contents of complaint, but that is not sufficient to set criminal law into motion, rather, before doing that, court issuing summoning order is required to apply its mind to facts of case and law applicable thereto, so that no injustice /prejudice is caused to person summoned - Court is required to examine nature of allegations made in complaint and evidence, oral and documentary adduced in support - Magistrate, cannot be a silent spectator rather, with a view to infer prima facie case, it is required to scrutinize record and analyze statements recorded in support of complaint, allegations contained in complaint, so that before issuing process, it arrives at a definite conclusion that prima facie offence has been committed by person proposed to be summoned - Court below has merely recorded that it is satisfied that there exist sufficient grounds to proceed against accused for commission of offence under S. 18(a)(i) and S.17 punishable under S.27(d) of Act, but no reason has been assigned in support thereof - Had learned court below bothered to look into material adduced on recorded by Drug Inspector, probably, learned court below would not have issued summoning order - Petition allowed.

ORDER :

By way of instant petition filed under S.482 CrPC, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of complaint filed against them under Ss. 18(a)(i) read with S.17 punishable under S. 27 (d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Rules, 1945 (hereinafter, ‘Act’ and ‘Rules’) and order dated 8.5.2018 (Annexure P-5) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Nahan, in Complaint No. 116/3 of 2018, titled State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Norang Raj Aggarwal and others, whereby learned court below proceeded to order summoning of the petitioners herein, in the complaint, as detailed herein above, lodged at the behest of the Drug Inspector, Nahan, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh.

2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record, are that the Chief Medical Officer, Sirmaur at Nahan, vide supply order dated 12.7.2016(available at page 30 of the paper book), placed order with M/s Novex Healthcare, Parwanoo, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh to purchase drugs namely Inj. Frusemide, Salbutamol Syp. and Tab. Dicyclomine 10mg. Pursuant to aforesaid supply order of drugs, M/s Novex Healthcare Parwanoo supplied one Lakh tablets of Dicyclomine 10 mg. Drug Inspector Hqrs Nahan, Sirmaur, after having seen some report published in social media that the wrapper containing tablet Dicyclomine has also been shown to be containing Dexamethasone, directed Chief Pharmacist, office of Chief Medical Officer, Sirmaur at Nahan to inform whether the above said medicine has been purchased by office of Chief Medical Officer or not? If yes, how much quantity is lying in stock and how much stands distributed. (page 25 of paper book). Pursuant to aforesaid communication, Chief Pharmacist o/o Chief Medical Officer Sirmaur at Nahan informed the Drug Inspector, Nahan that the office of Chief Medical Officer has received 1 Lakh tablets of Dicyclomine tablets I.P. (Dexamethasone I.P. 0.5 mg) having Batch No. DCL-03, D/M 07/2017, D/E 12/2018 vide bill No. 3122 dated 11.8.2017 and as on 21.11.2017, 65,050 tablets are lying in District Drug Store, Sirmaur at Nahan and letters have been issued to the concerned Block Medical Officers and Medical Officers in this regard. It was also informed vide aforesaid communication that two carton boxes containing 1600 tablets of Dicyclomine tablets I.P. (received from Rajprua Block) vide Batch No. DCL-03., D/M 07/2017, D/E 12/2018 manufactured by M/s Therawin Formulations, 69-71, Jasmeet Nagar, Ambala were found to be properly labeled.

3. After having noticed aforesaid illegality allegedly committed by manufacturer of drug namely Dicyclomine, Drug Inspector, Hqrs, Nahan, drew samples of aforesaid drug from the District Drug Store, Sirmaur on 21.11.2017 under the provisions of Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Rules, 1945, for the purpose of testing and analysis. Sample was referred to Government Analyst, Composite Testing Laboratory Kandaghat, for test and analysis, who declared that, said drug in question is Not of Standard Quality vide his report No. CTL-Drugs/2016-7732 dated 22.12.2017, for the reason that “The tablet strips were labeled as Dicyclomine tablets IP. The composition details stamped on the tablet strips stated that each tablet contains 0.5 mg of Dexamethasone. On analysis, the tablets were found to have contained 9.54 mg of Dicyclomine and Dexamethasone was found absent.” (available at page-50 and 51 of the paper-book). Besides above, Central Drug Inspector, who was made part of Central Investigation Team, got samples tested from Regional Drug Testing Laboratory, Chandigarh, who also vide report dated 29.12.2017 (Annexure P-2) concluded as under :

    “In the opinion of the undersigned the sample referred to above is not of standard quality as defined in the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and Rules there under for the reasons given below: -

The sample does not conforms to claim as per IP 2014 in respect to the Identification A.

Remarks: The sample is negative for Dexamethasone however, it i

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top