SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(HP) 1743

RAJIV SHARMA
Diwan Chand – Appellant
Versus
Simmi Saini – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the appellant :Mr. N.K.Thakur, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Rohit Bharoll, Advocate
For the respondent:Mr. T.S.Chauhan, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Justice Rajiv Sharma, J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.8.2007, rendered by the learned Addl. District Judge, Una, H.P., in HMA Petition No. 22 of 2001.

2. Key facts, necessary for the adjudication of this appeal are that the appellant has instituted the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), for dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 25.1.1998, according to Hindu rites, customs and ceremonies. The respondent along with her brother and sister threatened the appellant to leave the job in Bhatinda. They compelled him to stay in his native village. The appellant had no alternative but to accede to the wishes of the respondent and her brother. He left the job and started living at his ancestral village and opened the cycle repair shop. He was mentally harassed by the respondent. She used to threaten him to consume poison and to jump into the well to falsely implicate the appellant in a criminal case. The respondent neither conceived from the loins of the appellant nor any child was born out of the womb of the respondent.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top