SATYEN VAIDYA
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Hem Chand, Son Of Shri Sita Ram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
By way of instant appeal, State has assailed the judgment of acquittal dated 08.09.2009, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Arki, Tehsil Arki, Distt. Solan, H.P. in Criminal Case No. 64/2 of 2005.
2. Respondent was prosecuted for offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304-A of Indian Penal Code. Allegations against the respondent were that on 21.01.2005, while driving Bus No.HP-07-5099, he acted so rashly and negligently that he lost control over the same causing bus to roll down in deep gorge resulting into injuries to many occupants of the bus and death to four of them. It was specifically alleged against the respondent that he continued to drive the vehicle despite the fact that the lights of the bus were not working due to snag.
3. Respondent denied the charge and claimed trial. Prosecution examined total twenty six witnesses. Respondent was examined under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. Respondent did not lead any defence evidence. Learned Trial Court after appreciating the prosecution evidence, acquitted the respondent, vide impugned judgement.
4. State has assailed the impugned judgment on the grounds that the findings returned by the learned Trial Court were
M.G Agarwal Vs. State of Maharashtra
Rajesh Prasad Vs. State of Bihar and anr. (2022) 3 SCC 471
Sanwat Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
Aher Raja Khimavs. State of Saurashtra
M.G. Agarwal vs. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade vs. State of Maharashtra
Ramesh Babulal Doshi vs. State of Gujarat
Ajit Savant Majagvai vs. State of Karnataka
Ramesh Babulal Doshi vs. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.