IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Virender Singh, J.
Gulab Singh, S/o Late Sh. Bahadur Singh - Appellant
Vs.
Arvind Kumar, S/o Sh. Sita Ram - Respondent
First Appeal From Order No. 331 of 2017
Decided On : 02-09-2022
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 Section 173 - Accident - Rash and negligent driving - Died - Claim compensation - Claimants No. 1 to 3 are sons and claimant No. 4 is widow who had died due to the injuries sustained in road side accident - As per stand of claimants, deceased, alongwith his son, boarded bus bearing registration No. HP-71-2243 from Millah to Timbi - Bus in question, at relevant time, was being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner and when the said bus reached near Chamnol (Basog), , driver could not control bus, resultantly, bus had fallen into a deep gorge - In said accident, sustained injuries - He was firstly taken to Civil Hospital Paonta Sahib from where, he was referred to PGI Chandigarh, where he remained admit - Unfortunately had expired - Whether the learned MACT has rightly assessed the monthly earnings of the deceased as Rs. 3,000/- per month and thus, awarded the “just compensation”.
Finding of Court :
In view of the above fact, claimants are held entitled for a sum of Rs. 16,500/- under the head ‘loss of estate’ and Rs. 16,500/- under the head ‘funeral expenses’ -Apart from above, claimants are also held entitled for a sum of Rs. 44,000/- each under the head ‘parental consortium’ (claimants No. 1 to 3) and ‘spouse consortium’ (claimant No. 4) - No interference is required to be made to the amount awarded by the learned MACT on account of treatment of deceased Bahadur Singh before his death in PGI, Chandigarh - claimants are held entitled to compensation to tune Rs. 7,78,450/- alongwith interest @ 7.5% per annum, as awarded by learned MACT, from the date of filing of the claim petition till the realization of the whole amount from insurer as liability has been fastened upon the insurer by learned MACT, which has not been assailed by the insurer.
Result : Appeal is partly allowed
JUDGMENT :
The appellants detailed and described hereinabove have filed the present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘MV Act’) against the award, dated 29th April, 2017, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-I, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the MACT’).
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties to the lis are hereinafter referred to as referred by the learned MACT.
3. Claimants No. 1 to 3 are the sons and claimant No. 4 is the widow of Sh. Bahadur Singh, who had died due to the injuries sustained in the road side accident on 7th April, 2014, involving bus No. HP-71-2243.
4. The claim petition was filed against the respondents being the driver, owner and insurer of the ill fated bus.
5. As per the stand of the claimants, deceased Bahadur Singh, alongwith his son Gulab Singh, boarded the bus bearing registration No. HP-71-2243 from Millah to Timbi on 7th April, 2014. The bus in question, at the relevant time, was being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner and when the said bus reached near Chamnol (Basog), Tehsil Shillai, the driver could not control the bus, resultantly, the bus had fallen into a deep gorge. In the said accident, Bahadur Singh sustained injuries. He was firstly taken to Civil Hospital Paonta Sahib from where, he was referred to PGI Chandigarh, where he remained admit from 8th April, 2014 to 12th April, 2014. Unfortunately, on 12th April, 2014, Bahadur Singh had expired.
6. According to the claimants, the deceased was employed as a carpenter by one Shri Surat Singh, s/o Sh. Chanan Singh from where he was earning Rs. 15,000/- per month and he was also earning Rs. 10,000/- from agricultural pursuits. Thus, his income has been stated to be Rs. 25,000/- at the time of his death.
7. On the basis of the above facts, the claimants have sought the compensation of Rs. 15 lakhs alongwith interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of accident till the realization of the whole amount from the respondents.
8. The said claim petition was contested by the respondents.
9. Respondents No. 1 and 2 admitted the factum of accident but denied that there was any negligence on the part of the driver-respondent No. 2, by putting forward the plea of mechanical fault in the vehicle in question, at the time of accident.
10. The insurer has taken the preliminary objections regarding the facts that the driver of the vehicle was not having a valid driving licence; the vehicle was being plied in violation of terms and conditions of the Insurance Policy. The petition is also stated to be bad for non-joinder of necessary parties.
11. On all these submissions, the respondents have prayed for the dismissal of the claim petition.
12. The learned MACT framed the issues in this case on 6th June, 2015. Thereafter, the parties to the lis were directed to adduce the evidence.
13. After the closure of the evidence, the learned MACT has passed the impugned award by awarding the compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,26,000/- as loss of dependency, which has been confined only to claimant No. 4; Rs. 10,000/- as funeral expenses, Rs. 30,000/- as loss of love and affection and Rs. 10,000/- to respondent No. 4 for loss of consortium. Apart from this, a sum of Rs. 6,650/- has also been awarded to the claimants on account of the amount spent by them on the treatment of deceased Bahadur Singh at PGI, Chandigarh. Thus, a total sum of Rs. 1,82,650/- has been awarded to the claimants by the learned MACT.
14. Feeling aggrieved from the said award, the claimants have approached this Court under Section 173 of the MV Act. The bone of contention of the claimants is that the learned MACT has wrongly assessed the income of the deceased, at the time of his death, as Rs. 3,000/- per month. According to the claimants, this amount is a cruel joke for the claimants, as in the year 2014, even an unskilled worker, as per the notification issued by the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Depa
The court emphasized that in compensation claims, oral testimony can substantiate income claims in the absence of documentary evidence, ensuring just compensation principles are adhered to.
LMV licence suffices for transport vehicle under 7500kg GVW sans endorsement; self-employed carpenter notional income Rs.800/day on oral evidence; 1/4th personal expenses deduction (4 dependents); 10....
THE COURT HELD THAT THE TRIBUNAL ERRED IN FIXING THE MONTHLY INCOME OF THE DECEASED AT RS.3,000/- AND IN APPLYING A MULTIPLIER OF 14. THE COURT ALSO HELD THAT THE TRIBUNAL ERRED IN NOT AWARDING ADEQU....
The main legal point established is the importance of assessing 'just and fair' compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 168, based on income tax returns and legal precedents.
Age of deceased should be basis for applying multiplier.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.