SANDEEP SHARMA
Gautam Thakur, Son of Late Baldev Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
By way of instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.PC, prayer has been made by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 111, dated 12.7.2015, registered at PS Manali, District Kullu, H.P., under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of IPC, as well as consequent proceedings, if any, pending before the competent court of law.
2. Precisely, facts of the case, which may be relevant for the adjudication of the case at hand are that petitioner filed two applications dated 18.8.1999 and 4.4.2000 to the HPSEBL, praying therein for extension of load qua the connection No. GC-105 and for reduction of load with regard to connection No. GC-100 (Annexure P-2). Electricity Board while acceding to the prayer made in the aforesaid applications extended/reduced the load qua the aforesaid electricity meters. Petitioner had been using the aforesaid electricity connections in the premises from the date of their installment and there is no complaint, if any, with regard to payment of bills. On 11.7.2015, respondent No.2, who is mother of the petitioner, lodged a complaint to the SHO PS Manali (Annexure P-3), alleging therein that petitioner forged signatures of his father i.e. husband of the complainant-re
Asmathunnisa v. State of A.P. (2011) 11 SCC 259
M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd v. State of Maharashtra
Prashant Bharti v. State (NCT of Delhi)
R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866
Rajiv Thapar and Ors v. Madan Lal Kapoor
Smt. Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi and Others (1976) 3 SCC 736
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.