IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Satyen Vaidya, J.
Sh. Rajiv Chandel S/o Sh. Laiq Ram - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Himachal Pradesh, Through Secretary (Industries) To The Government Of H.P., Shimla - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 7697 Of 2013
Decided On : 31-10-2022
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-F, G and H – Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Termination of Services - Past Service Benefits - Whether termination of services without complying with provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority and amount of compensation above worker is entitled to from above employer. Para 11.
Finding of the Court :
Quotations were invited for grant of work as Chowkidar from interested candidates - Petitioner was one of three candidates, who submitted their quotations and rate of petitioner was found lowest - Petitioner accordingly was engaged as Chowkidar by Incharge, Government Silk Centre, on payment of fixed monthly amount of Rs.1800/ - Learned counsel for petitioner has tried to take benefit from cross-examination of RW-1 by asserting that said witness had admitted continuous employment of petitioner - Contentions so raised, however, cannot be countenanced for reason that witness (RW-1) had also clarified that petitioner had worked in Gold Mine Project and thereafter he worked as Chowkidar on contract - Hence, there is no continuity in service - Petitioner having been disengaged from his daily wage job in Gold Mine Project had remained silent and had thereafter accepted new assignment as Chowkidar on contract basis without any reservation - It is more than settled that while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution, this Court is not to sit as Court of appeal over decisions of Tribunals constituted under special laws - It is only in case where award passed by Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal suffers from absolute illegality or perversity that interference may be required.
Result: Petition dismissed.
ORDER :
By way of instant petition, petitioner has assailed award dated 01.07.2013 passed by learned Presiding Judge, Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, H.P. (for short, “the Tribunal”) in Reference No. 210/2012.
2. Petitioner raised an industrial dispute and a reference was made to learned Tribunal by the appropriate Government in following terms:
3. Petitioner claimed before the learned Tribunal that he had worked as daily wage Beldar from 3.4.2002 till 28.8.2008 continuously in Silk Centre, Kothi Majher. He was transferred as daily wage worker to the Government Seri Culture Centre, Kandrour in March, 2003. Petitioner thus laid challenge to the termination of his services being in violation of Sections 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
4. Respondents, by way of reply filed before the Tribunal, admitted that the petitioner was engaged as daily wager w.e.f. 3.4.2002. The respondents further submitted that the engagement of petitioner was in a project named as ‘Gold Mines’. According to respondents, petitioner had worked in the aforesaid project on daily wages till 30.6.2004 whereafter his services were disengaged for paucity of work. Later, petitioner worked purely on contract basis as Chowkidar at Government Seri Culture Centre, Kandrour from 1.5.2005 till 28.8.2008. The said engagement of petitioner was stated to be result of an offer made by him to work purely on contract basis at the rate of Rs.1800/- per month. The sanction for the post of Chowkidar, against which petitioner had worked, was withdrawn on closure of CDV project.
5. Learned Tribunal held that the petitioner worked from 26.3.2002 to 30.6.2004 on daily wage basis in Gold Mine Project. Reliance was placed on the mandays chart, Ext. RW-1/B, pertaining to petitioner. It was also held that as per seniority list, petitioner was the junior most and three other persons senior to him were also disengaged even prior to the disengagement of the petitioner in the project. Further, it was held that on 2.5.2005 vide letter Ext.RW-1/E the Incharge, Government Silk Centre, Kandrour sought permission to engage services of a Chowkidar on contract basis. The requisite sanction/permission was accorded on 11.7.2005 vide Ext. RW-1/F to engage services of Store Chowkidar purely on contractual basis after inviting the quotations. Three persons including petitioner submitted their respective quotations and the rate quoted by petitioner being lowest, he was engaged as a Chowkidar purely on contract at Rs.1800/- per month. The services of petitioner as Chowkidar were dispensed with after 28.08.2008 as the store articles were disbursed/ distributed and there was no further requirement of such job.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the records of the case carefully.
7. It is on record that the petitioner worked on daily wage basis in Gold Mine Project w.e.f. 03.04.2002 till 30.06.2004. There is nothing to suggest that the petitioner continued to work in the same project thereafter. Rather, the record reveals that petitioner remained disengaged from 30.06.2004 till 01.05.2005, whereafter the engagement of petitioner was as contract Chowkidar on specific terms. The engagement of petitioner as Chowkidar was in pursuance to specific time bound requirement to manage the stores and such requirement was placed by the Incharge Government Silk Centre, Kandrour vide letter Ext. RW-1/E
Decisions of Tribunals - Jurisdiction - While exercising the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, this Court is not to sit as Court of appeal over the decisions of Tribunals constitute....
The court found that the termination of the petitioner was unlawful due to the retention of junior employees, violating the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Termination of services without following due process under the Industrial Disputes Act is illegal, and reinstatement with seniority is warranted.
Once a worker accedes to the terms of a contractual appointment, they cannot revert to their previous employment status. The conditions for benefits under Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.