TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, VIRENDER SINGH
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
GHANDHI RAM S/O SALO RAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
1. The State has preferred the present appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred as to as the ‘Cr.P.C.’) against the judgment dated 17.05.2010, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned trial Court’) in Sessions Trial No. 34 of 2009.
2. By way of the judgment dated 17.05.2010, the learned trial Court has acquitted the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the ‘accused’) from the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’).
3. Brief facts, leading to the filing of the present appeal, before this Court, may be summed up, as under.
4. That on 23.04.2009, Sh. Uttam Chand alongwith Sh. Balam Ram and Sh. Subhash Kumar, reported the matter to the police at Police Post Chouhra that Smt. Koula Devi, Wd/o Sh. Madho Ram, who was residing in her Adhwar (seasonal abode), had been found, in a naked condition and she might have died.
5. In order to verify the above facts, ASI Manohar Lal, In-charge, Police Post Chouhra, alongwith police officials had reached at the spot, where, Sh
Govinda Reddy vs. State of Mysore
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar vs. State of M.P. AIR 1952 SC 343 : 1953 Cri. L.J. 129
Mohan Lal Pangasa vs. State of U.P. (1974) 4 SCC 607: 1974 SCC (Cri) 643: AIR 1974 SC 1144
Munikrishna @ Krishna vs. State by Ulsoor P.S. 2022 (0) Supreme(SC) 1097
Raghav Prapanna Tripathi vs. State of U.P. AIR 1963 SC 74 : (1963) 1 CrLJ 70
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.