SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 808

SATYEN VAIDYA
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Addl. A.G., and Mr. Narender Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.

JUDGMENT :

Satyen Vaidya, J.

The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 24.7.2010/27.07.2010 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Kagra at Dharamshala, H.P., in Sessions Case No. 3-D/VII-2008, whereby the appellants were convicted and sentenced as under:-

Offence(s)

Substantive sentence

Fine

Default Punishment.

498-A/34 IPC

Simple imprisonment for three years

Rs.5,000/-

Simple imprisonment for six months

306 of the IPC

Simple imprisonment for three years

Rs. 5,000/-

Simple imprisonment for six months.

All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. During the pendency of appeal, appellants No.2 and 3 have died and only appellant No.1 survives.

3. Brief facts of the case are that Smt. Sumna Devi was wife of the appellant No.1. She consumed poison on 18.07.2006 and as a result thereof died on 28.07.2006. Brother of deceased got recorded his statement under section 154 Cr.P.C. on 18.7.2006 and on its basis FIR No. 153/2006 was registered under section 498-A/34 IPC.

4. It was alleged in statement under section 154 Cr.P.C. that the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top