IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, VIRENDER SINGH, JJ.
Poonam Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others - Respondents
CWP No.5707 of 2022
Decided on : 19-12-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 14, 16 – Equality before Law – Grant of extension – Lack of uniformity – Whether person has a vested right to insist that offer of appointment be kept in abeyance for an indefinite period of time of several months/years or till he/she completes his/her higher studies which are being pursued - Requirement of administration to fill up posts would have to be taken into consideration and essentially would be for administration to exercise discretion to extend or not to extend time for joining duty. (Para 17).
Finding of the Court:
Court are not inclined to disturb status quo, more particularly, when duration of Course has already come to an end and, therefore, permit petitioner to remain on leave without pay, by further directing respondents that such period shall not be counted for regularization of petitioner.
Results: Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
The petitioner completed her four years’ B.Sc. (Nursing) from Shimla Nursing College, in the year 2016. On 28.12.2019, an advertisement was issued by the Himachal Pradesh Staff Selection Commission, Hamirpur, (for short ‘Commission’) for filling up various posts including 307 posts of Staff Nurse (on contract basis). The petitioner being fully eligible applied for the same. She also gave the written test that was conducted by the Commission in September, 2020. Since, the result had not been declared, the petitioner, in the meanwhile, started pursuing her M.Sc. (Nursing) Course of two years duration.
2. It is eventually on 21st January, 2022 that the result of the written test was declared wherein the petitioner having qualified was offered appointment on contract basis on fixed salary of Rs.13,500/-. The petitioner was directed to join at Dr. YSPGMC, Nahan, on or before 04.02.2022. However, as observed above, since the petitioner had been pursuing M.Sc. (Nursing), she accordingly sought extension of time for joining. The respondents acceded to the request of the petitioner by extending the period of joining by six months vide communication dated 01.02.2022 by extending the date of joining as 02.07.2022 which infact ought to have been 02.08.2022.
3. Since, the course of M.Sc. (Nursing), had not been completed, therefore, the petitioner filed representation dated 08.06.2022 requesting the respondents to allow time uptill November, 2022 to complete her course. The respondents did not respond to the request made by the petitioner constraining her to join at Nahan, on 02.07.2022.
4. Thereafter, the petitioner again made a request to the respondents vide her letter dated 28.07.2022 to grant leave without pay with effect from 01.08.2022 to 30.09.2022 so as to enable her to complete M.Sc (Nursing) Course because she had completed her 80% of the Course. The respondents again did not choose to respond to the same constraining the petitioner to file the instant petition for grant of the following reliefs:-
ii) That in the alternative the respondents may very kindly be directed to grant the extension in joining the post as Staff Nurse up till 15th November, 2022 on the analogy of the past practice, in the interest of law and justice.”
5. The respondents have opposed the petition by filing reply wherein preliminary objections with regard to locus-standi and cause of action etc. have been raised. It is averred that the petitioner had been appointed as Staff Nurse on contract basis vide Office Order dated 21.01.2022 on fixed terms and conditions including a specific condition with regard to entitlement of leave at Sr. No.5 (as admissible in respect of contractual employees) which reads as under:-
6. It is also averred that the request made by the petitioner initially was considered sympathetically by the
If in opinion of Government, there is a severe shortage of nurses due to which after joining service, nurse cannot be granted extension to join service as leave to contractual leave employee otherwis....
Contract service before regularization counts as part of minimum five years service for in-service quota admission and study leave entitlement under prospectus and CCS Leave Rules, per binding preced....
The court established that probationers may be granted study leave under extraordinary circumstances, despite general restrictions, and that differential treatment of similarly situated individuals i....
'Dies Non' order treating study leave period harshly affects service rights and violates natural justice without hearing; medical officer's higher studies period directed as study leave under 1979 Ru....
The denial of study leave to the petitioners was found to be unfair, and the court emphasized the importance of following the prescribed time schedule for admission to medical courses.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.