IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Satyen Vaidya, J.
Shakti Singh - Petitioner
Vs.
State of H.P. - Respondent
Cr.MMO No. 1154 of 2022
Decided On : 24-02-2023
Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 457 - Himachal Pradesh Excise Act - Section 39(1)(a) - Liquor of different brands and beer - Possession - Seeking release of the liquor on the ground that the liquor was being transported under valid permit/pass - It was alleged that police had intercepted a vehicle (Mahindra Pick up) bearing registration within jurisdiction of Police Station - On checking the vehicle, a large number of boxes having liquor of different brands and beer were found being transported - Permits/passes carried by driver of vehicle were not found in terms of Himachal Pradesh Excise Act and Rules framed thereunder - It was found that quantity of liquor being transported in the vehicle was in excess of permits/passes (Para 5).
Finding of Court :
Record nowhere reveals that liquor being carried in Mahindra Pick-up bearing registration except seven boxes, as detailed above, did not belong to petitioner - In given facts of case, petitioner has not been booked with allegations of transporting illicit liquor - It being so, pending trial of case, liquor belonging to petitioner can be ordered to be released in his favour - Licence period of petitioner is nearing the end - No fruitful purpose shall be served by allowing liquor owned by petitioner to be kept in police custody till final disposal of case - On other hand, on completion of licence period, entire liquor will become useless for petitioner and he will be put to irreparable loss in monetary terms.
Result: Petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
Heard.
By way of this petition, petitioner has assailed the order dated 18.11.2022 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No.2, Rohru, District Shimla, H.P. in Case No. 165-4 of 2022, whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 457 of the Cr.P.C. for release of the case property has been rejected.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 28.10.2022, a case under Section 39(1)(a) of the Himachal Pradesh Excise Act was registered at Police Station Rohru, District Shimla, vide FIR No. 192 of 2022. It was alleged that the police had intercepted a vehicle (Mahindra Pick up) bearing registration No. HP-10B-8698 on Adal road within the jurisdiction of Police Station Rohru. On checking the vehicle, a large number of boxes having liquor of different brands and beer were found being transported. The permits/passes carried by the driver of the vehicle were not found in terms of Himachal Pradesh Excise Act and Rules framed thereunder. It was found that the quantity of liquor being transported in the vehicle was in excess of the permits/passes. Further, the vehicle which was authorised to transport the liquor was different and lastly, huge quantity of liquor was being transported at the time when general elections were to be conducted. The entire quantity of liquor found in the vehicle was seized and taken into possession by the police.
3. Petitioner claims himself to be a liquor licencee. He preferred an application under Section 457 of the Cr.P.C. before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No.2, Rohru, District Shimla, H.P. seeking release of the liquor on the ground that the liquor was being transported under valid permit/pass. The vehicle originally carrying the liquor from Shimla had broken down on way, therefore, the consignment was shifted to another vehicle.
4. Learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No.2, Rohru, dismissed the application of the petitioner by holding as under:-
5. Aggrieved against the dismissal of his application petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to set aside the impugned order and to release the entire liquor, as was permitted to be transported for him, in his favour.
6. During the pendency of the petition, directions were issued to respondent/State to complete the investigation and file the final report under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. Investigating agency after completion of investigation has now submitted the final report under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. and copy of such report has been placed on record.
7. Perusal of report under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. submitted by respondent/State reveals that except for 7 boxes of liquor (two boxes of IMFL “All Season”, one box containing ½ bottles of brand “All Season”, two boxes containing bottles of Sterling brand, One box containing bottles of Episode brand and One box containing bottles Old Monk
Presence of entire quantity of liquor as case property during trial will not be required.
The court held that releasing impounded liquor would reward the petitioner for permit violations, which is impermissible under law.
The court ruled that ownership of the liquor and its non-adulteration justified the release of seized goods despite route deviation under the Odisha Excise Act, 2008.
Habitual offenders may face stricter measures regarding confiscation of vehicles involved in illegal activities, despite claims for release under statutory provisions.
The Magistrate lacks jurisdiction to release property seized under the Uttar Pradesh Excise Act when confiscation proceedings are pending, as established by Section 72 of the Act.
Guidelines for vehicle release under prohibition laws cannot conflict with statutory provisions, and decisions must be consistent and just.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.