SATYEN VAIDYA
Het Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
The petitioner is accused in case FIR No. 18 of 2023, dated 23.01.2023, under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (for short ‘ND&PS Act’, at Police Station, Boileauganj, District Shimla, H.P. He is in custody since 23.01.2023.
2. Brief allegations against the petitioner are that on a prior information, police intercepted the vehicle No. HP-24D-4194 (Innova) within the jurisdiction of Police Station (West), Shimla at about 10.10 p.m. Total 10 persons including females and children were found occupying the vehicle. One Mansa Ram was on the wheel and the petitioner was occupying the front passenger seat. Two minor girls sitting on the rear seat were appearing to be sick and accordingly, the vehicle was taken to PHC, Dhami. The girls were provided first aid. Thereafter, the vehicle was checked. Petitioner is stated to be holding a jacket in his lap. On checking the jacket, 356 grams ‘Charas’ was recovered. None of the other occupants of the vehicle are stated to have knowledge about the petitioner carrying the contraband with him. The case was registered and petitioner was arrested.
3. The status report filed on behalf of the respo
No fruitful purpose shall be served by allowing detention of petitioner in custody for indeterminate period. Pre-trial incarceration otherwise is not the rule.
Point of Law : . There is no material against the petitioner to suggest that he will again indulge in similar criminal activities, if released on bail.
Drug abuse has become serious hazard to social and economic development.
Undue delay in trial, in appropriate cases, can be a reason to release an accused of offence involving commercial quantity under ND&PS Act.
The weight of contraband and the petitioner's criminal history are crucial factors in determining bail eligibility in NDPS Act cases.
Since there is no past criminal history, relating to his involvement in cases under NDPS Act. There is no material against the petitioner to suggest that he will again indulge in similar criminal act....
(1) 510 gms of “Charas” – No Recovery of contraband – The quantity of contraband involved in the case is intermediate, hence the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not applicable.(2) SIM card i....
The inadmissibility of confessional statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act and the requirement of prima facie evidence for granting bail in NDPS Act cases.
Merely because police has found some evidence of withdraw of money by Mandeep Kumar from ATM at Anni is not sufficient to infer that money was paid to petitioner - Exchange of phone calls is a subjec....
Bail - Even in the absence of fulfillment of one of dual conditions prescribed in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, bail cannot be granted.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.