SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 81

SANDEEP SHARMA
Rattan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Som Dutt – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mohar Singh.
For the Respondents: Ajay Sharma, Atharv Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP SHARMA, J.

1. Instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India lays challenge to judgment dated 30.11.2022 passed by learned Additional District Judge-I, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 03-N/XIV/2021, setting aside the order dated 13.7.2021 passed by learned Civil Judge, Nurpur in CMA No. 373/2019 in Civil Suit No. 200/2019 titled Rattan Singh vs. Balwant Singh, whereby learned trial Court, while allowing an application filed under Order XXXIX, rule 1 and 2 CPC by appellant/plaintiff (hereinafter ‘plaintiff’) restrained the respondents/defendants (hereinafter ‘defendants’) from raising any kind of construction and changing the nature of the suit land, as described in the plaint.

2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record, are that the plaintiff filed a civil suit against the defendants (hereinafter, ‘defendant’) (Annexure P-1), for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their family members, relatives, agents, servants, attorneys, assignees, masons, labourers etc. permanently from raising any kind of construction, changing the nature of the land or doing any act, wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top