SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 394

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
United Indian Insurance Company Limited - Appellant
Versus
Smt. Ram Piari and others - Respondents
FAO Nos. 90 of 2017 & FAO No. 607 of 2018
Decided On : 07-07-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Lalit K. Sharma.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Mr. Arun Rana vice Mr. Radhey Shyam Gautam, Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Mr. Mukesh Sharma.

Point of Law : Compensation on account of loss of love and affection is not permissible but compensation on account of spousal and parental consortium for children is admissible.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166 - Motor Accident - Rash and negligent driving - Grant of compensation - Appeals arise out of award passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Deceased was self employed and his age was 59 year, but yet learned Tribunal below proceeded to order increase of 15% which is not in accordance with law - Para 16.

Finding of the Court :

Deceased was self employed and his age was 59 year, but yet learned Tribunal below proceeded to order increase of 15% which is not in accordance with law and as such, award needs to be modified on that account also - Apportionment of amount shall remain same, as held by learned Tribunal below - Similarly, so far rate of interest is concerned, in view of prevailing market rate of interest at time of accident, same also calls for no interference as such, is upheld - Award passed by learned Tribunal below stands modified.

Result : Appeals disposed.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Since, both the appeals arise out of award dated 18.12.2016 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh in Claim Petition No. 30/2 of 2015, involving same parties, the same were heard together and are being disposed of vide this common judgment. However, for the sake of clarity, parties shall be referred to as mentioned in FAO No. 90 of 2017.

2. Precisely, the facts of the case, which are common in both the cases, are that on 1.5.2015, deceased Shri Shree Ram son of Banshi Ram, aged 59, boarded a bus bearing registration No. HP-23B-1723 from Village Kot, District Bilaspur. Though above named person had to get down at Village Bharoli Kalan but when the bus reached at a curve near Village Dholag (Gehrian), Tehsil Jhandutta, Bilaspur, driver of the bus, respondent No.3 Vinod Kumar, lost control over the bus and on account of his rash and negligent driving, bus fell down below the road, as a result of which, deceased named herein above, suffered multiple injuries on his person and died on the spot.

3. Respondent No.1, Smt. Ram Piari widow of Shri Shree Ram (hereinafter, referred to as ‘claimant’), instituted claim petition under S.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter, ‘Act’) for grant of compensation on account of death of Shree Ram, being his legal representative. She claimed that since deceased Shree Ram was the sole bread winner in the family, she has been left with no source of income as such, be granted compensation. Claimant named herein above, claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.20,000/- being a Government contractor and besides this, was earning additional sum of Rs.5,000/- by doing agricultural pursuits. She alleged that she spent Rs.1.00 Lakh on the last rites of the deceased.

4. Owner and driver of vehicle, respondent Nos.2 and 3 respectively, by way of reply, though did not dispute the factum of accident and death of Shree Ram but claimed that the amount claimed by the claimant, is highly excessive. Apart from above, both the respondents herein above, claimed that since at the time of accident, offending vehicle was duly insured with the appellant-insurance company and driver was having valid documents and driving licence, liability, if any, is upon insurance company.

5. Appellant-insurance company, by way of filing separate reply, though admitted the factum of accident and death of deceased named above, but claimed that the bus in question bearing registration No. HP23B-1723 was being driven by the person, who had no valid and effective driving licence to drive such class of vehicle. Apart from above, appellant-insurance company also claimed that there were no valid documents like registration certificate, fitness certificate, route permit and insurance etc.

6. On the basis of pleadings of the parties, learned Tribunal below, framed following issues :

    “1. Whether Shri Shri Ram died due to the rash and negligent driving of bus No. HP-23B-1723 by respondent No. 2/driver as alleged? OPP

2. If issue No.1 is proved in affirmative, whether the petitioners are entitled to compensation as claimed, if so, its quantum and from whom? OP parties.

3. Whether the claim petition is not maintainable in the present form? OPR

4. Whether the petitioners have no cause of action? OPR

5. Whether the petitioners have no locus standi to sue? OPR

6. Whether the respondent No.2 was no holding and possessing a valid and effective driving licence to drive the bus as alleged. If so, its effect? OPR-3

7. Whether the bus was being plied in violation of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy as alleged,. If so, its effect? OPR-3

8. Relief.”

7. Subsequently, vide award dated 17.9.2017, learned Tribunal below allowed the claim petition and saddled the appellant-insurance company with liability to pay compensation of Rs.8,29,064/- alongwith interest at the rate of 7.5 % from the da

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top